Immunisation decision-making and barriers to vaccine uptake among children under-5 in limited-resource settings

Immunisation coverage remains a fundamental challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, which still has the highest under-five mortality rate in the world, due to wide-ranging drivers that have complicated interventions. Unless the knowledge gaps affecting childhood vaccination decision-making are identified and effectively addressed, low immunisation coverage will persist in the region. This study aims to assess the factors influencing immunisation decision-making among caregivers of children Under-5 years old, and to understand the behaviours that shape these influences. The study employed qualitative methods, such as focus group discussions. Participants were caregivers of children Under-5 years old in Nigeria. A simplified cluster sampling approach was used to select caregivers from four geographical clusters. A minimum of seven caregivers from each cluster were purposively included. The data were analysed deductively using a meta-aggregation approach. The findings show that caregivers’ immunisation decision-making are mainly motivated by: inadequate knowledge about childhood immunisation, especially the conflict between vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable diseases; masculinity (attitudes of fathers or men can help or hinder immunisation); the child’s gender (the perception of stronger versus weaker sex); misinformation about immunisation (especially the perception that it is a form of family planning). Other influences include the exploitation of caregivers by healthcare workers; incessant stock-outs of vaccines leading to complacent behaviour associated with vaccine hesitancy; religious beliefs; poor attitudes of healthcare workers; among other factors. The factors influencing immunisation decision-making in limited-resource settings and the motivations shaping these behaviours are largely psychological, socio-cultural, behavioural, health system and structural. Interventions designed to address the root causes of gender inequity must start with men’s attitudes and the socio-cultural practices that enable them. Furthermore, the sandwich model for addressing vaccine misinformation seems promising in countering myths and conspiracies about vaccines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33121-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immunisation decision-making and barriers to vaccine uptake among children under-5 in limited-resource settings

Gbadebo Collins Adeyanju
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.17
article

Immunisation decision-making and barriers to vaccine uptake among children under-5 in limited-resource settings

Gbadebo Collins Adeyanju
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Immunisation coverage remains a fundamental challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, which still has the highest under-five mortality rate in the world, due to wide-ranging drivers that have complicated interventions. Unless the knowledge gaps affecting childhood vaccination decision-making are identified and effectively addressed, low immunisation coverage will persist in the region. This study aims to assess the factors influencing immunisation decision-making among caregivers of children Under-5 years old, and to understand the behaviours that shape these influences. The study employed qualitative methods, such as focus group discussions. Participants were caregivers of children Under-5 years old in Nigeria. A simplified cluster sampling approach was used to select caregivers from four geographical clusters. A minimum of seven caregivers from each cluster were purposively included. The data were analysed deductively using a meta-aggregation approach. The findings show that caregivers’ immunisation decision-making are mainly motivated by: inadequate knowledge about childhood immunisation, especially the conflict between vaccine-preventable and non-vaccine-preventable diseases; masculinity (attitudes of fathers or men can help or hinder immunisation); the child’s gender (the perception of stronger versus weaker sex); misinformation about immunisation (especially the perception that it is a form of family planning). Other influences include the exploitation of caregivers by healthcare workers; incessant stock-outs of vaccines leading to complacent behaviour associated with vaccine hesitancy; religious beliefs; poor attitudes of healthcare workers; among other factors. The factors influencing immunisation decision-making in limited-resource settings and the motivations shaping these behaviours are largely psychological, socio-cultural, behavioural, health system and structural. Interventions designed to address the root causes of gender inequity must start with men’s attitudes and the socio-cultural practices that enable them. Furthermore, the sandwich model for addressing vaccine misinformation seems promising in countering myths and conspiracies about vaccines.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Buea (CM), University of Erfurt (DE), Catholic University Institute of Buea (CM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
2.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.