Laser shock peening with acoustic emission in-situ monitoring for quality control

Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface strengthening technology that imparts beneficial compressive residual stress and hardening depths on metal surfaces, improving fatigue resistance. Its principle involves using high-power laser pulses to generate plasma, confined by a transparent overlay, which produces shock waves that induce plastic deformation and residual compressive stress in the material. While LSP offers significant technical advantages and is valuable across various industries like aerospace, defense, and manufacturing, ensuring consistent surface quality is challenging due to process variability and complexity. Traditional surface quality inspection methods like X-ray diffraction and the drilling method are offline, destructive, and cannot provide real-time feedback, making them cumbersome for industrial applications. This necessitates the development of reliable, real-time quality assessment techniques. This paper posits a comparison between different types of LSP systems, specifically considering potential distinctions between conventional industrial setups and potentially more accessible or "affordable" systems. A key parameter noted in varying LSP experiments is laser pulse duration, with typical "industrial" systems often utilising short pulse durations (tens of nanoseconds). Conversely, some experimental setups, potentially representing different system configurations, have been observed using higher pulse durations, such as 51 ns. This study explores how such differences in pulse duration, potentially characteristic of different system types, influence the fundamental LSP process, including plasma generation, shock wave characteristics, and resulting material properties like residual stress and hardness. This paper will discuss the implications for achieving desired surface quality and the effectiveness of different monitoring techniques, such as acoustic emission (AE), for on-line quality assessment across these varying system configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1784/ndt2025.3c2
Primary Topic
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laser shock peening with acoustic emission in-situ monitoring for quality control

Pratik Shukla, Rui Qin, James M. Griffin, Paul Smith
Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
article

Laser shock peening with acoustic emission in-situ monitoring for quality control

Pratik Shukla, Rui Qin, James M. Griffin, Paul Smith
article en

Abstract

Laser shock peening (LSP) is a surface strengthening technology that imparts beneficial compressive residual stress and hardening depths on metal surfaces, improving fatigue resistance. Its principle involves using high-power laser pulses to generate plasma, confined by a transparent overlay, which produces shock waves that induce plastic deformation and residual compressive stress in the material. While LSP offers significant technical advantages and is valuable across various industries like aerospace, defense, and manufacturing, ensuring consistent surface quality is challenging due to process variability and complexity. Traditional surface quality inspection methods like X-ray diffraction and the drilling method are offline, destructive, and cannot provide real-time feedback, making them cumbersome for industrial applications. This necessitates the development of reliable, real-time quality assessment techniques. This paper posits a comparison between different types of LSP systems, specifically considering potential distinctions between conventional industrial setups and potentially more accessible or "affordable" systems. A key parameter noted in varying LSP experiments is laser pulse duration, with typical "industrial" systems often utilising short pulse durations (tens of nanoseconds). Conversely, some experimental setups, potentially representing different system configurations, have been observed using higher pulse durations, such as 51 ns. This study explores how such differences in pulse duration, potentially characteristic of different system types, influence the fundamental LSP process, including plasma generation, shock wave characteristics, and resulting material properties like residual stress and hardness. This paper will discuss the implications for achieving desired surface quality and the effectiveness of different monitoring techniques, such as acoustic emission (AE), for on-line quality assessment across these varying system configurations.

Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive TestingVol. 2025(1)
Manufacturing Technology Centre (United Kingdom) (GB), Coventry University (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.