Comparison of Laser Ultrasonic Testing and traditional Ultrasonic Testing

Ultrasonic inspection is a widely accepted method in the aerospace industry for detecting defects and characterizing materials. However, the traditional ultrasonic technique requires precise alignment and couplant between the ultrasonic scanner and the material, or even complete water immersion. This can be impractical and limits its application. Laser ultrasonics overcomes these inconveniences by generating and detecting ultrasonic waves by lasers. This enables fast contactless ultrasonic inspection without couplant or immersion. While laser ultrasonic inspection has advantages over traditional ultrasonic inspection, the generated ultrasound is relatively broadband and its intensity is limited by the ablation threshold, i.e.the maximum laser energy without damaging the material. Therefore a comparative study between ultrasonics and laser ultrasonics was conducted on representative aerospace components, focusing on defect detectability, signal-to-noise ratios, and inspection speed. Laser ultrasonics is up to 10 times faster than traditional single element ultrasonics. Both techniques can easily discriminate defects of 0.25 inch, however laser ultrasonics is less suited for defect detection in thick (> 5 mm) components. Furthermore, the relaxed alignment conditions of laser ultrasonics allow for the fast inspection of complex-shaped components.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1784/ndt2025.1b1
Primary Topic
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Laser Ultrasonic Testing and traditional Ultrasonic Testing

W. Krämer, Patrick A. Jansen, Benjamin van Elburg
Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
article

Comparison of Laser Ultrasonic Testing and traditional Ultrasonic Testing

W. Krämer, Patrick A. Jansen, Benjamin van Elburg
article en

Abstract

Ultrasonic inspection is a widely accepted method in the aerospace industry for detecting defects and characterizing materials. However, the traditional ultrasonic technique requires precise alignment and couplant between the ultrasonic scanner and the material, or even complete water immersion. This can be impractical and limits its application. Laser ultrasonics overcomes these inconveniences by generating and detecting ultrasonic waves by lasers. This enables fast contactless ultrasonic inspection without couplant or immersion. While laser ultrasonic inspection has advantages over traditional ultrasonic inspection, the generated ultrasound is relatively broadband and its intensity is limited by the ablation threshold, i.e.the maximum laser energy without damaging the material. Therefore a comparative study between ultrasonics and laser ultrasonics was conducted on representative aerospace components, focusing on defect detectability, signal-to-noise ratios, and inspection speed. Laser ultrasonics is up to 10 times faster than traditional single element ultrasonics. Both techniques can easily discriminate defects of 0.25 inch, however laser ultrasonics is less suited for defect detection in thick (> 5 mm) components. Furthermore, the relaxed alignment conditions of laser ultrasonics allow for the fast inspection of complex-shaped components.

Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive TestingVol. 2025(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Laser Ultrasonic Testing and traditional Ultrasonic Testing — W. Krämer, Patrick A. Jansen, et al. · Proceedings of the Annual British Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS