Comparison of the Pelvic Rotation Angle During Hip Lateral Rotation in the Standing and Prone Positions in Participants With and Without Tensor Fasciae Latae/Iliotibial Tract Tightness

Background: Tensor fasciae latae (TFL) and iliotibial tract (ITB) tightness can pull the pelvis during hip lateral rotation (HLR), increasing pelvic rotation due to muscle tension. Among various tests, the HLR test in the prone position (HLRP) is a clinical evaluation tool for assessing lumbopelvic motion with lower-extremity movement. However, performing the HLRP may result in less compensatory motion and a relatively decreased pelvic rotation angle (PRA) because of a wide base of support. Moreover, there were no studies investigating PRA during an HLR test in the standing position (HLRS). Objects: This study aimed to compare the PRA in the horizontal plane during HLRS and the HLRP between individuals with and without TFL/ITB tightness. Methods: Thirty participants with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) TFL/ITB tightness as assessed by Ober’s test, were recruited. The PRA was measured during active HLRS and HLRP. Two-way mixed analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in the PRA between groups and within positions. Results: When HLRP and HLRS were performed, the PRA in the horizontal plane occurred at 1.65° ± 0.98° and 7.68° ± 4.69°, respectively, in the TFL/ITB tightness group, and at 1.27° ± 1.07° and 2.37° ± 1.96°, respectively, in the control group. A significant interaction effect was identified between groups and positions on the PRA (p < 0.05). Individuals with TFL/ITB tightness had a significantly greater PRA during HLRS than those in the control group. The PRA during HLRS was significantly greater than that during HLRP in individuals with TFL/ITB tightness. Conclusion: These results suggest that TFL/ITB tightness contributes to increased PRA during HLRS compared with HLRP. Clinically, assessment of the PRA in the standing may provide a functional indicator of compensatory pelvic motion during hip rotation of 45°.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Therapy Korea
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2025.32.3.253
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Pelvic Rotation Angle During Hip Lateral Rotation in the Standing and Prone Positions in Participants With and Without Tensor Fasciae Latae/Iliotibial Tract Tightness

Gyeong‐tae Gwak, Oh-Yun Kwon, Il-kyu Ahn, Hyeon Seok Baek
Physical Therapy Korea
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Comparison of the Pelvic Rotation Angle During Hip Lateral Rotation in the Standing and Prone Positions in Participants With and Without Tensor Fasciae Latae/Iliotibial Tract Tightness

Gyeong‐tae Gwak, Oh-Yun Kwon, Il-kyu Ahn, Hyeon Seok Baek
article en

Abstract

Background: Tensor fasciae latae (TFL) and iliotibial tract (ITB) tightness can pull the pelvis during hip lateral rotation (HLR), increasing pelvic rotation due to muscle tension. Among various tests, the HLR test in the prone position (HLRP) is a clinical evaluation tool for assessing lumbopelvic motion with lower-extremity movement. However, performing the HLRP may result in less compensatory motion and a relatively decreased pelvic rotation angle (PRA) because of a wide base of support. Moreover, there were no studies investigating PRA during an HLR test in the standing position (HLRS). Objects: This study aimed to compare the PRA in the horizontal plane during HLRS and the HLRP between individuals with and without TFL/ITB tightness. Methods: Thirty participants with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) TFL/ITB tightness as assessed by Ober’s test, were recruited. The PRA was measured during active HLRS and HLRP. Two-way mixed analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in the PRA between groups and within positions. Results: When HLRP and HLRS were performed, the PRA in the horizontal plane occurred at 1.65° ± 0.98° and 7.68° ± 4.69°, respectively, in the TFL/ITB tightness group, and at 1.27° ± 1.07° and 2.37° ± 1.96°, respectively, in the control group. A significant interaction effect was identified between groups and positions on the PRA (p < 0.05). Individuals with TFL/ITB tightness had a significantly greater PRA during HLRS than those in the control group. The PRA during HLRS was significantly greater than that during HLRP in individuals with TFL/ITB tightness. Conclusion: These results suggest that TFL/ITB tightness contributes to increased PRA during HLRS compared with HLRP. Clinically, assessment of the PRA in the standing may provide a functional indicator of compensatory pelvic motion during hip rotation of 45°.

Physical Therapy KoreaVol. 32(3)
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.