Analysis of Students' Misconceptions on Mole Concept Materials and Chemical Formula Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Based Indonesian Curriculum

This research aims to determine the percentage level of students' misconceptions regarding the concept of moles and chemical formulas as well as each sub-concept where there are misconceptions and their causes in class XI-C SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. Misconceptions were measured using a four-tier diagnostic test instrument based on mixed method research with explanatory sequential design. The research sample was 32 students from class XI-C at SMAN 5 Kupang, who were determined using purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques were carried out using a four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test, interview guide questionnaire and documentation. Based on the research results, the misconceptions that occur in class XI-C students at SMAN 5 Kupang are classified as moderate misconceptions with a percentage of 41.56%. Significant misconceptions were identified in 5 sub-concepts with an average CR (confidence rating) score above 4.00, namely: (1) Relative Atomic Mass and Relative Molecular Mass 18.75%; (2) Calculation of Mole Concept 24.99%; (3) Reaction Equalization 21.87%; (4) Empirical Formula and Molecular Formula 18.75%; (5) Hydrate Compound 23.43%. Students' misconceptions are caused by 5 factors based on questionnaire and interview data, namely: (1) Students 35.416%; (2) Teachers 6.25%; (3) Learning methods 25.78%; (4) Teaching context 13.125%; (5) Textbooks 20%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orbital - The Electronic Journal of Chemistry
Published
2025-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v17i5.22292
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Students' Misconceptions on Mole Concept Materials and Chemical Formula Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Based Indonesian Curriculum

Lolita A. M. Parera, Mariana Ferreira Alves de Carvalho, Heru Christianto
Orbital - The Electronic Journal of Chemistry
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Analysis of Students' Misconceptions on Mole Concept Materials and Chemical Formula Using Four-Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test Based Indonesian Curriculum

Lolita A. M. Parera, Mariana Ferreira Alves de Carvalho, Heru Christianto
article en

Abstract

This research aims to determine the percentage level of students' misconceptions regarding the concept of moles and chemical formulas as well as each sub-concept where there are misconceptions and their causes in class XI-C SMA Negeri 5 Kupang. Misconceptions were measured using a four-tier diagnostic test instrument based on mixed method research with explanatory sequential design. The research sample was 32 students from class XI-C at SMAN 5 Kupang, who were determined using purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques were carried out using a four-tier multiple choice diagnostic test, interview guide questionnaire and documentation. Based on the research results, the misconceptions that occur in class XI-C students at SMAN 5 Kupang are classified as moderate misconceptions with a percentage of 41.56%. Significant misconceptions were identified in 5 sub-concepts with an average CR (confidence rating) score above 4.00, namely: (1) Relative Atomic Mass and Relative Molecular Mass 18.75%; (2) Calculation of Mole Concept 24.99%; (3) Reaction Equalization 21.87%; (4) Empirical Formula and Molecular Formula 18.75%; (5) Hydrate Compound 23.43%. Students' misconceptions are caused by 5 factors based on questionnaire and interview data, namely: (1) Students 35.416%; (2) Teachers 6.25%; (3) Learning methods 25.78%; (4) Teaching context 13.125%; (5) Textbooks 20%.

Orbital - The Electronic Journal of Chemistry
University of Nusa Cendana (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.