Measuring the Resilience of Additive Manufacturing Supply Chains Based on a Cloud Model: An Integrated Weighting and Cloud Centroid Method

Building resilient additive manufacturing supply chains (AM-SCs) has become a strategic imperative as firms confront increasing uncertainty, technological disruption, and volatile market environments. However, existing resilience evaluation approaches face three critical limitations: (i) insufficient integration of qualitative and quantitative indicators, (ii) biased weighting methods that rely solely on expert judgement or data-driven metrics, and (iii) limited interpretability and diagnostic value for managerial decision-making. To address these gaps, this study develops a cloud-based resilience measurement framework tailored to AM-SCs. A five-dimensional, 26-indicator evaluation system is constructed to reflect resistance, recovery, adaptability, coordination, and learning capabilities. An integrated weighting approach — combining ordinal-relation and entropy weighting — balances expert knowledge with data variability, while the cloud model generates digital features (Ex, En, He) to characterize uncertainty in mixed-type indicators. The centroid-to-ideal deviation method is introduced to quantify resilience levels and identify performance gaps. Empirical results from two AM-SC firms across two periods (2017–2019; 2020–2022) demonstrate improved resilience, with Firm B achieving a 52% reduction in weighted deviation and Firm H a 4–5% improvement. The framework offers actionable diagnostic insights and provides a reproducible approach for evidence-based resilience enhancement. Relative to prior resilience assessments that treat qualitative and quantitative indicators separately, our approach unifies them under a cloud model and yields interpretable deviation diagnostics. The results suggest targeted upgrades (supplier reliability, digital scheduling, training cadence) and offer a transferable template for AM supply-chain evaluation under data uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219686727500351
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the Resilience of Additive Manufacturing Supply Chains Based on a Cloud Model: An Integrated Weighting and Cloud Centroid Method

Zhixin Chen, Yanling Feng, Wenjing Li
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Measuring the Resilience of Additive Manufacturing Supply Chains Based on a Cloud Model: An Integrated Weighting and Cloud Centroid Method

Zhixin Chen, Yanling Feng, Wenjing Li
article en

Abstract

Building resilient additive manufacturing supply chains (AM-SCs) has become a strategic imperative as firms confront increasing uncertainty, technological disruption, and volatile market environments. However, existing resilience evaluation approaches face three critical limitations: (i) insufficient integration of qualitative and quantitative indicators, (ii) biased weighting methods that rely solely on expert judgement or data-driven metrics, and (iii) limited interpretability and diagnostic value for managerial decision-making. To address these gaps, this study develops a cloud-based resilience measurement framework tailored to AM-SCs. A five-dimensional, 26-indicator evaluation system is constructed to reflect resistance, recovery, adaptability, coordination, and learning capabilities. An integrated weighting approach — combining ordinal-relation and entropy weighting — balances expert knowledge with data variability, while the cloud model generates digital features (Ex, En, He) to characterize uncertainty in mixed-type indicators. The centroid-to-ideal deviation method is introduced to quantify resilience levels and identify performance gaps. Empirical results from two AM-SC firms across two periods (2017–2019; 2020–2022) demonstrate improved resilience, with Firm B achieving a 52% reduction in weighted deviation and Firm H a 4–5% improvement. The framework offers actionable diagnostic insights and provides a reproducible approach for evidence-based resilience enhancement. Relative to prior resilience assessments that treat qualitative and quantitative indicators separately, our approach unifies them under a cloud model and yields interpretable deviation diagnostics. The results suggest targeted upgrades (supplier reliability, digital scheduling, training cadence) and offer a transferable template for AM supply-chain evaluation under data uncertainty.

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN), Beijing Wuzi University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.