Tiger Habitat Occupancy in Chitwan–Parsa Complex: Implications for Human–Tiger Conflict Management Strategies

The rebound of tiger populations in Nepal over the last decade has renewed hope for species conservation but also heightened the risk of conflict where humans and tigers coexist. Most of these tigers inhabit Chitwan-Parsa Complex (CPC), which includes core areas prohibiting humans and buffer zones allowing limited activities. To understand distribution within CPC and nearby forests, we constructed a Bayesian occupancy model using data from a sign survey conducted between December 2021 and February 2022. We estimated occupancy for 2021-22 dry-season within CPC on a 10 km × 10 km gird and as well as the use by tigers and prey on a 2 km × 2 km subgrid. The average estimated occupancy <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> within 10 km × 10 km grids and detection <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> within 2 km × 2 km subgrids were 0.90 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.32-0.36), respectively. The presence of tigers was more strongly related to prey occupancy at the home-range scale whereas factors such as vegetation, human population density (HPD), and elevation affected used portion of home range. HPD significantly reduced habitat use by tigers and prey. We compare our modeled tiger-use distribution to an independent dataset containing conflict causing tiger rescue and relocation records. Tigers use only increased odds of rescues occurring in a subgrid by 10%, but subgrids with above average HPD had 2.2 times higher odds of rescues than those with low HPD, and the grids with above average prey use had 3.8 times higher odds of rescues than those with low prey. The pattern of increased rescues in high-prey-use areas was driven by subgrids with above average HPD, where the odds of rescues were 10.98 times higher than those with low prey use. The varying odds of conflict by HPD and prey use suggest future approaches to tiger conservation and conflict resolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72739
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tiger Habitat Occupancy in Chitwan–Parsa Complex: Implications for Human–Tiger Conflict Management Strategies

Bishnu Prasad Bhattarai, Bhagawan Raj Dahal, Naresh Subedi, Anil Prasai et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Tiger Habitat Occupancy in Chitwan–Parsa Complex: Implications for Human–Tiger Conflict Management Strategies

Bishnu Prasad Bhattarai, Bhagawan Raj Dahal, Naresh Subedi, Anil Prasai, Saneer Lamichhane, Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral, Bed Kumar Dhakal, Ajay Karki, Jeffrey Mintz, Abhinaya Pathak, Trishna Rayamajhi
article en

Abstract

The rebound of tiger populations in Nepal over the last decade has renewed hope for species conservation but also heightened the risk of conflict where humans and tigers coexist. Most of these tigers inhabit Chitwan-Parsa Complex (CPC), which includes core areas prohibiting humans and buffer zones allowing limited activities. To understand distribution within CPC and nearby forests, we constructed a Bayesian occupancy model using data from a sign survey conducted between December 2021 and February 2022. We estimated occupancy for 2021-22 dry-season within CPC on a 10 km × 10 km gird and as well as the use by tigers and prey on a 2 km × 2 km subgrid. The average estimated occupancy <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> within 10 km × 10 km grids and detection <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> within 2 km × 2 km subgrids were 0.90 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) and 0.34 (95% CI 0.32-0.36), respectively. The presence of tigers was more strongly related to prey occupancy at the home-range scale whereas factors such as vegetation, human population density (HPD), and elevation affected used portion of home range. HPD significantly reduced habitat use by tigers and prey. We compare our modeled tiger-use distribution to an independent dataset containing conflict causing tiger rescue and relocation records. Tigers use only increased odds of rescues occurring in a subgrid by 10%, but subgrids with above average HPD had 2.2 times higher odds of rescues than those with low HPD, and the grids with above average prey use had 3.8 times higher odds of rescues than those with low prey. The pattern of increased rescues in high-prey-use areas was driven by subgrids with above average HPD, where the odds of rescues were 10.98 times higher than those with low prey use. The varying odds of conflict by HPD and prey use suggest future approaches to tiger conservation and conflict resolution.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(12)
University of Wyoming (US), Zoological Society of London (GB), Tribhuvan University (NP), University of San Diego (US), Florida International University (US), University of California System (US), University of Florida (US), University of California San Diego (US), Mountain Medicine Society of Nepal (NP), National Trust for Nature Conservation (NP)
WWF Nepal
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.