Detection of energetic equivalence depends on food web architecture and estimators of energy use

Ecologists have long debated the universality of the energetic equivalence rule, which posits that population energy use should be invariant with average body size due to negative size-density scaling. We explore size-density and size-energy use scaling across 183 geographically-distributed soil invertebrate food webs (comprising 55,054 individual soil invertebrates) to investigate the universality of these fundamental energetic equivalence rule assumptions across trophic levels and varying food web structure. Additionally, we compare two measures of energy use to investigate size-energy use relationships: population metabolism and energy fluxes. We find that size-density scaling does not support energetic equivalence in soil communities. Furthermore, evidence of energetic equivalence is dependent on the estimate of energy use applied, the trophic level of consumers, and food web properties. Our study demonstrates a need to integrate food web energetics and trophic structure to better understand how energetic constraints shape the body size structure of terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67615-6
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection of energetic equivalence depends on food web architecture and estimators of energy use

Ulrich Brose, Anton Potapov, Nico Eisenhauer, Stefan Scheu et al.
Nature Communications
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
article

Detection of energetic equivalence depends on food web architecture and estimators of energy use

Ulrich Brose, Anton Potapov, Nico Eisenhauer, Stefan Scheu, Benoît Gauzens, Kiri Joy Wallace, Andrew D. Barnes, David Ott, Olga Ferlian, Myriam R. Hirt, Grace Mitchell, Bibishan Rai, Poppy Joaquina Romera, Malte Jochum, Ana Carolina Antunes
article en

Abstract

Ecologists have long debated the universality of the energetic equivalence rule, which posits that population energy use should be invariant with average body size due to negative size-density scaling. We explore size-density and size-energy use scaling across 183 geographically-distributed soil invertebrate food webs (comprising 55,054 individual soil invertebrates) to investigate the universality of these fundamental energetic equivalence rule assumptions across trophic levels and varying food web structure. Additionally, we compare two measures of energy use to investigate size-energy use relationships: population metabolism and energy fluxes. We find that size-density scaling does not support energetic equivalence in soil communities. Furthermore, evidence of energetic equivalence is dependent on the estimate of energy use applied, the trophic level of consumers, and food web properties. Our study demonstrates a need to integrate food web energetics and trophic structure to better understand how energetic constraints shape the body size structure of terrestrial ecosystems.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Würzburg (DE), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Institute for Biodiversity (DE), Institute of Zoology (KZ), Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz (DE), International University Institute (IHI) Zittau (DE), University of Waikato (NZ), University of Göttingen (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE), Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ), Leipzig University (DE)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Nature, Marsden Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.