Impact of 85 kHz versus 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA scan speeds on image quality in retinal diseases and diagnostic reliability of choroidal neovascular membranes

The purpose of the study was to compare Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) scan speeds of 85 kHz and 125 kHz with respect to image quality, diagnostic reliability, and scan time in patients with retinal diseases. In this prospective cohort study, OCTA images were obtained at both scan speeds in 70 eyes from 40 patients with retinal diseases. Masked expert graders evaluated qualitative parameters including clinical utility, artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative parameters including scan time, Heidelberg Q-score, and OCTA-Q score were recorded. In 46 eyes with visible choroidal neovascular membrane in the avascular layer of OCTA, AngioTool (Image J) was used to assess vessel percentage area, vessel junction density, average vessel length, and E-Lacunarity. Acquisition speed of 125 kHz OCTA was significantly faster than that of 85 kHz. There were no statistically significant differences in AngioTool parameters between the two protocols. 125 kHz was significantly better than 85 kHz for image quality with fewer noise artefacts and vessel projection artefacts. In conclusion, 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA offers comparable to better image quality to the 85 kHz OCTA with significantly faster acquisition, potentially improving clinical workflow without compromising diagnostic reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32549-y
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of 85 kHz versus 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA scan speeds on image quality in retinal diseases and diagnostic reliability of choroidal neovascular membranes

Nehal Nailesh Mehta, Anna Heinke, Rosa Muñoz, Mohamed Morsy et al.
Scientific Reports
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Impact of 85 kHz versus 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA scan speeds on image quality in retinal diseases and diagnostic reliability of choroidal neovascular membranes

Nehal Nailesh Mehta, Anna Heinke, Rosa Muñoz, Mohamed Morsy, Lingyun Cheng, Evan Walker, Melanie Tran, William R. Freeman, Ines Doris Nagel, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Ahmed L. Ali
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) scan speeds of 85 kHz and 125 kHz with respect to image quality, diagnostic reliability, and scan time in patients with retinal diseases. In this prospective cohort study, OCTA images were obtained at both scan speeds in 70 eyes from 40 patients with retinal diseases. Masked expert graders evaluated qualitative parameters including clinical utility, artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative parameters including scan time, Heidelberg Q-score, and OCTA-Q score were recorded. In 46 eyes with visible choroidal neovascular membrane in the avascular layer of OCTA, AngioTool (Image J) was used to assess vessel percentage area, vessel junction density, average vessel length, and E-Lacunarity. Acquisition speed of 125 kHz OCTA was significantly faster than that of 85 kHz. There were no statistically significant differences in AngioTool parameters between the two protocols. 125 kHz was significantly better than 85 kHz for image quality with fewer noise artefacts and vessel projection artefacts. In conclusion, 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA offers comparable to better image quality to the 85 kHz OCTA with significantly faster acquisition, potentially improving clinical workflow without compromising diagnostic reliability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Fleet Science Center (US), University of California San Diego (US), Retina Institute (US), Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Institutes of Health, University of California, San Diego
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.