Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Acetic Acid for Treating Colonized Burns Wounds (AceticA): A Double-Blind, Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Trial

Evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of 0.5% and 2.0% (w/v) acetic acid on colonised burns wounds for three days after hospital admission. Burn wound infection and secondary sepsis are serious complications. Due to growing bacterial resistance worldwide, effective antimicrobial agents that do not increase the risk of resistance and are non-toxic are required. In this is phase II trial, 0.5% or 2.0% acetic acid was applied to burns colonised by specifically identifiable bacteria. Participants aged ≥16 years with burns ≥1% body surface area were randomly assigned 1:1. Efficacy was measure by change in bacterial load from swabs taken daily for four consecutive days. The study encountered two interruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown. Consequently, major protocol amendments were implemented to ensure alignment with established hospital clinical pathways. Between Feb-2018 and Oct-2021, 22 participants were randomized. Participant characteristics were balanced, except fewer full thickness burns in the 2.0% acetic acid group. Two percent acetic acid significantly decreased the bacterial load compared to 0.5% concentration (p=.0129) but also increased the pain score (p=.012). Only one serious adverse event occurred: a grade 3 urinary tract infection unrelated to acetic acid, which resolved without sequalae. Acetic acid was safe and well-tolerated. Both concentrations lowered bacterial load, with 2.0% proving more effective. The study also indicates that dressing changes every 12 hours may be required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf228
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Acetic Acid for Treating Colonized Burns Wounds (AceticA): A Double-Blind, Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Trial

Kristian Brock, Laura Nice, Naiem Moiemen, Sebastian Tullie et al.
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Efficacy and Optimal Dose of Acetic Acid for Treating Colonized Burns Wounds (AceticA): A Double-Blind, Single-Center, Randomized, Controlled Phase II Trial

Kristian Brock, Laura Nice, Naiem Moiemen, Sebastian Tullie, Victoria Homer, Rizwana Imran, Darren Barton, Sian Jenkins, Khaled Al‐Tarrah
article en

Abstract

Evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of 0.5% and 2.0% (w/v) acetic acid on colonised burns wounds for three days after hospital admission. Burn wound infection and secondary sepsis are serious complications. Due to growing bacterial resistance worldwide, effective antimicrobial agents that do not increase the risk of resistance and are non-toxic are required. In this is phase II trial, 0.5% or 2.0% acetic acid was applied to burns colonised by specifically identifiable bacteria. Participants aged ≥16 years with burns ≥1% body surface area were randomly assigned 1:1. Efficacy was measure by change in bacterial load from swabs taken daily for four consecutive days. The study encountered two interruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown. Consequently, major protocol amendments were implemented to ensure alignment with established hospital clinical pathways. Between Feb-2018 and Oct-2021, 22 participants were randomized. Participant characteristics were balanced, except fewer full thickness burns in the 2.0% acetic acid group. Two percent acetic acid significantly decreased the bacterial load compared to 0.5% concentration (p=.0129) but also increased the pain score (p=.012). Only one serious adverse event occurred: a grade 3 urinary tract infection unrelated to acetic acid, which resolved without sequalae. Acetic acid was safe and well-tolerated. Both concentrations lowered bacterial load, with 2.0% proving more effective. The study also indicates that dressing changes every 12 hours may be required.

Journal of Burn Care & Research
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK, Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.