Multi-site harmonization for magnetoencephalography spectral power data

A known issue with multi-site studies is the presence of site-specific effects that may confound effects of interest. These effects may be additive, multiplicative, or both. Numerous strategies have been developed and tested on microarray data from multiple batches, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and functional MRI (fMRI). Multi-site magnetoencephalography (MEG) data represent a unique problem, however. The major MEG platforms differ substantially in sensor geometry, sensor layout, and noise-cancellation strategy, all of which may affect the distribution of the data. Another factor to consider in harmonization is retention of the relationship between the data and any covariates of interest. These relationships may be nonlinear, and individual sites may differ in the distribution of covariates. In this report, we test several previously developed methods for harmonization on a set of 16 open access datasets. We investigated ComBat, which uses empirical Bayes to improve model estimation; GAM-ComBat (Neuroharmonize), which extends ComBat to incorporate generalized additive modeling of the covariates of interest; CovBat (with the GAM extension), which performs a second round of ComBat harmonization to harmonize the covariance; and RELIEF, a matrix factorization technique. We found that overall, GAM-ComBat was the best choice for harmonizing the data while retaining the nonlinear dependence of the data on covariates of interest such as age. We demonstrate that harmonization of MEG data is possible and should be an integral part of any multi-site study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.1099
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-site harmonization for magnetoencephalography spectral power data

Frederick W. Carver, Anna Namyst, Allison C. Nugent, Paul M. Thompson et al.
Imaging Neuroscience
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Multi-site harmonization for magnetoencephalography spectral power data

Frederick W. Carver, Anna Namyst, Allison C. Nugent, Paul M. Thompson, Jeffrey Stout
article en

Abstract

A known issue with multi-site studies is the presence of site-specific effects that may confound effects of interest. These effects may be additive, multiplicative, or both. Numerous strategies have been developed and tested on microarray data from multiple batches, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and functional MRI (fMRI). Multi-site magnetoencephalography (MEG) data represent a unique problem, however. The major MEG platforms differ substantially in sensor geometry, sensor layout, and noise-cancellation strategy, all of which may affect the distribution of the data. Another factor to consider in harmonization is retention of the relationship between the data and any covariates of interest. These relationships may be nonlinear, and individual sites may differ in the distribution of covariates. In this report, we test several previously developed methods for harmonization on a set of 16 open access datasets. We investigated ComBat, which uses empirical Bayes to improve model estimation; GAM-ComBat (Neuroharmonize), which extends ComBat to incorporate generalized additive modeling of the covariates of interest; CovBat (with the GAM extension), which performs a second round of ComBat harmonization to harmonize the covariance; and RELIEF, a matrix factorization technique. We found that overall, GAM-ComBat was the best choice for harmonizing the data while retaining the nonlinear dependence of the data on covariates of interest such as age. We demonstrate that harmonization of MEG data is possible and should be an integral part of any multi-site study.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 4
University of Southern California (US), National Institute of Mental Health (US), National Institute of Mental Health (CZ)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.