Estimating excess winter mortality in Serbia

Seasonal variations in mortality are well documented, indicating a higher death rate during the winter compared with other periods of the year. Despite the evidence that vulnerability to winter weather has decreased, a significant number of preventable deaths still occur during the colder period of the year. Assessment of measures for excess winter mortality (EWM) is important for the public health system to be improved, but also for policymakers and stakeholders to be informed about current as well as future mortality-related climate change issues. This paper explores trends in EWM in Serbia and examines the validity of the methods of estimating EWM using monthly mortality data for the period 2000-2021. In order to estimate excess death using different measures, three methods were applied. First method (M1) uses the winter period as December to March and compare with the average of the non-winter period (preceding: August-November and following: April-July); second method (M2) defines winter as December to March against summer months (preceding: August and September, and following: June and July); and the third method (M3) set six months from October to March as a winter against the six-month non-winter period (preceding: August and September, and following: April to July). All three methods confirmed a higher number of deaths during the winter, and highest excess winter mortality was observed using the M3. This method classifies months in two wide seasons and determines winter as a six-month period from October to March, which is arbitrary but also well recognized in literature and generally used by public health services. The summer period in M3 is also casual and adjusted to the latitude. Compared with M3, M2 gives slightly lower excess winter mortality, and this measure also classifies months in two too seasons, but excludes October, November, April and May. A pronounced disparity between the gender was also observed, with women recording higher excess mortality in most seasons, while during pandemic years the situation changes in favor of a higher excess mortality of the male population. The first measure, M1, estimates the lowest number of excess deaths, but considering climate characteristics in Serbia, this method uses the most suitable approach to assess winter mortality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Demografija
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5937/demografija2522087a
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating excess winter mortality in Serbia

Daniela Arsenović
Demografija
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Estimating excess winter mortality in Serbia

Daniela Arsenović
article en

Abstract

Seasonal variations in mortality are well documented, indicating a higher death rate during the winter compared with other periods of the year. Despite the evidence that vulnerability to winter weather has decreased, a significant number of preventable deaths still occur during the colder period of the year. Assessment of measures for excess winter mortality (EWM) is important for the public health system to be improved, but also for policymakers and stakeholders to be informed about current as well as future mortality-related climate change issues. This paper explores trends in EWM in Serbia and examines the validity of the methods of estimating EWM using monthly mortality data for the period 2000-2021. In order to estimate excess death using different measures, three methods were applied. First method (M1) uses the winter period as December to March and compare with the average of the non-winter period (preceding: August-November and following: April-July); second method (M2) defines winter as December to March against summer months (preceding: August and September, and following: June and July); and the third method (M3) set six months from October to March as a winter against the six-month non-winter period (preceding: August and September, and following: April to July). All three methods confirmed a higher number of deaths during the winter, and highest excess winter mortality was observed using the M3. This method classifies months in two wide seasons and determines winter as a six-month period from October to March, which is arbitrary but also well recognized in literature and generally used by public health services. The summer period in M3 is also casual and adjusted to the latitude. Compared with M3, M2 gives slightly lower excess winter mortality, and this measure also classifies months in two too seasons, but excludes October, November, April and May. A pronounced disparity between the gender was also observed, with women recording higher excess mortality in most seasons, while during pandemic years the situation changes in favor of a higher excess mortality of the male population. The first measure, M1, estimates the lowest number of excess deaths, but considering climate characteristics in Serbia, this method uses the most suitable approach to assess winter mortality.

Demografija(22)
University of Novi Sad (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.