Drawing beyond ruins: Speculative spatial practices in contested spaces

This paper investigates the potential of architectural drawing as a speculative and political practice in cities marked by conflict, displacement and spatial erasure. Moving beyond conventional understandings of drawing as a representational tool, it argues that drawing can serve as a mode of spatial resistance and reimagination – particularly in contexts where architecture’s material agency is interrupted. Focusing on Lebbeus Woods’s Sarajevo Project (1993), developed during the siege of Sarajevo, the paper examines how visual techniques such as fragmentation, layering and sequential narration enable drawing to function as a conceptual reconstruction of space. Extending this analysis, the paper considers how contemporary practices echo Woods’s methods in resisting spatial violence through visual means. The argument culminates in a reflection on my own creative practice: a collage-based drawing situated in the divided city of Nicosia, Cyprus. Here, drawing becomes a means of engaging with inaccessible terrain through speculative intervention. In doing so, it contributes to architectural discourses that grapple with the politics of form and space in conflict-affected geographies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drawing Research Theory Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00162_1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing beyond ruins: Speculative spatial practices in contested spaces

Ceren Cekmez
Drawing Research Theory Practice
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Drawing beyond ruins: Speculative spatial practices in contested spaces

Ceren Cekmez
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential of architectural drawing as a speculative and political practice in cities marked by conflict, displacement and spatial erasure. Moving beyond conventional understandings of drawing as a representational tool, it argues that drawing can serve as a mode of spatial resistance and reimagination – particularly in contexts where architecture’s material agency is interrupted. Focusing on Lebbeus Woods’s Sarajevo Project (1993), developed during the siege of Sarajevo, the paper examines how visual techniques such as fragmentation, layering and sequential narration enable drawing to function as a conceptual reconstruction of space. Extending this analysis, the paper considers how contemporary practices echo Woods’s methods in resisting spatial violence through visual means. The argument culminates in a reflection on my own creative practice: a collage-based drawing situated in the divided city of Nicosia, Cyprus. Here, drawing becomes a means of engaging with inaccessible terrain through speculative intervention. In doing so, it contributes to architectural discourses that grapple with the politics of form and space in conflict-affected geographies.

Drawing Research Theory PracticeVol. 10(2)
Newcastle University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.