Drawing as ontogenetic force of architecture

This article explores drawing’s potential to inf(l)ect design processes by generating and holding in incipiency sensibilities and vitality affect derived from lived movement-experience. It speculates on how, by doing so, it might carry through and infuse aesthetic or existential values into modes of inhabitation. The author claims that if drawing is to make a difference for architecture, it must be broached from the perspective of ontogenetic processes in order to understand how its singular intrinsic forces might co-compose with extraneous forces to produce surplus-value from within object(ive) constellations. Grounded in process philosophy, and drawing from dance, the essay examines ways of thrusting drawing into movement-thinking to activate its self-creative autonomy, coagulating and transforming a multitude of heterogeneous occurrences into novelty. It then examines how this approach, or manner of drawing, might a(e)ffect our understanding of concepts such as ‘site’, ‘body’, architectural ‘form’ and ‘inhabitation’.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Drawing Research Theory Practice
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/drtp_00163_1
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing as ontogenetic force of architecture

Renée Charron
Drawing Research Theory Practice
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

Drawing as ontogenetic force of architecture

Renée Charron
article en

Abstract

This article explores drawing’s potential to inf(l)ect design processes by generating and holding in incipiency sensibilities and vitality affect derived from lived movement-experience. It speculates on how, by doing so, it might carry through and infuse aesthetic or existential values into modes of inhabitation. The author claims that if drawing is to make a difference for architecture, it must be broached from the perspective of ontogenetic processes in order to understand how its singular intrinsic forces might co-compose with extraneous forces to produce surplus-value from within object(ive) constellations. Grounded in process philosophy, and drawing from dance, the essay examines ways of thrusting drawing into movement-thinking to activate its self-creative autonomy, coagulating and transforming a multitude of heterogeneous occurrences into novelty. It then examines how this approach, or manner of drawing, might a(e)ffect our understanding of concepts such as ‘site’, ‘body’, architectural ‘form’ and ‘inhabitation’.

Drawing Research Theory PracticeVol. 10(2)
Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drawing as ontogenetic force of architecture — Renée Charron · Drawing Research Theory Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS