Shrinkage as an Opportunity? Local Cultures, Power Structures, and Spaces of Possibility in Two Communities in Lusatia

Building on the diagnosis of urban shrinkage, we examine how two cities in Lusatia are dealing with the challenges of structural change. Adopting the concept of “spaces of possibility” (SoP), we view shrinkage as a dynamic phenomenon that holds both risks and opportunities for urban development and is moderated by local actors, which can lead to conflicts of varying degrees. Using two qualitative case studies in the municipalities of “Rabenfurt” and “Ostenau,” we show that historical backgrounds, established cultures, and patterns of decision‐making are particularly decisive factors in this regard. Rabenfurt represents a top‐down logic with a focus on economic development, which tends to marginalise citizens’ opinions. Ostenau is characterised by a bottom‐up perspective, actively involving local initiatives and citizens in decision‐making processes. However, the created status quo in Ostenau is fragile. The results emphasise that local cultures and modes of decision‐making should be taken into consideration when applying the concept of SoP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Planning
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.11081
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shrinkage as an Opportunity? Local Cultures, Power Structures, and Spaces of Possibility in Two Communities in Lusatia

S. E. Mann, Franz Erhard, Emilia Socha, Julian Borchard
Urban Planning
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Shrinkage as an Opportunity? Local Cultures, Power Structures, and Spaces of Possibility in Two Communities in Lusatia

S. E. Mann, Franz Erhard, Emilia Socha, Julian Borchard
article en

Abstract

Building on the diagnosis of urban shrinkage, we examine how two cities in Lusatia are dealing with the challenges of structural change. Adopting the concept of “spaces of possibility” (SoP), we view shrinkage as a dynamic phenomenon that holds both risks and opportunities for urban development and is moderated by local actors, which can lead to conflicts of varying degrees. Using two qualitative case studies in the municipalities of “Rabenfurt” and “Ostenau,” we show that historical backgrounds, established cultures, and patterns of decision‐making are particularly decisive factors in this regard. Rabenfurt represents a top‐down logic with a focus on economic development, which tends to marginalise citizens’ opinions. Ostenau is characterised by a bottom‐up perspective, actively involving local initiatives and citizens in decision‐making processes. However, the created status quo in Ostenau is fragile. The results emphasise that local cultures and modes of decision‐making should be taken into consideration when applying the concept of SoP.

Urban PlanningVol. 11
University of Siegen (DE), Zittau/Görlitz University of Applied Sciences (DE), International University Institute (IHI) Zittau (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.