The Financial Argument for Centralization of Care for Esophagectomy

Compared to high-volume esophagectomy centers, Medicare spends more per episode at low-volume centers, possibly driven by readmissions and post-acute care utilization. Restricting esophagectomy to high-volume centers may both achieve safety and reduce spending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgery Open
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000628
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Financial Argument for Centralization of Care for Esophagectomy

Samantha L. Savitch, Nicole M. Mott, Cody Lendon Mullens, Kyle H. Sheetz et al.
Annals of Surgery Open
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

The Financial Argument for Centralization of Care for Esophagectomy

Samantha L. Savitch, Nicole M. Mott, Cody Lendon Mullens, Kyle H. Sheetz, Kiran Hari Lagisetty, Jyothi R. Thumma
article en

Abstract

Compared to high-volume esophagectomy centers, Medicare spends more per episode at low-volume centers, possibly driven by readmissions and post-acute care utilization. Restricting esophagectomy to high-volume centers may both achieve safety and reduce spending.

Annals of Surgery OpenVol. 7(1)
University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.