Overcoming Two Lacunae in Nietzsche’s Story of the “Slave Revolt”

Abstract This article addresses two perceived lacunae arising from Nietzsche’s famous “slave revolt” in morality. The first concerns the dominant interpretation of Nietzsche’s narrative in the Genealogy (GM), that on his own considered model of agency, there is no “doer” behind the “deed”; rather, the “the doing is everything.” This article gives reasons to think this interpretation is incorrect. The relevant passage (GM I:13) offers a stylistic flourish to elucidate a view of agency belonging to the warrior-nobles. The second concerns why these warrior-nobles come to assent to “slavish” values at all. Exploring Nietzsche’s functional claims about power, this article demonstrates another normative sphere at some level recognized and revered by the warrior-nobles, which allows them to consider the priests as rivals. Priestly spirituality, as an alternative mode of empowerment, tracks different conceptions of value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/jnietstud.56.2.0167
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overcoming Two Lacunae in Nietzsche’s Story of the “Slave Revolt”

Richard J. Elliott
The Journal of Nietzsche Studies
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Overcoming Two Lacunae in Nietzsche’s Story of the “Slave Revolt”

Richard J. Elliott
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article addresses two perceived lacunae arising from Nietzsche’s famous “slave revolt” in morality. The first concerns the dominant interpretation of Nietzsche’s narrative in the Genealogy (GM), that on his own considered model of agency, there is no “doer” behind the “deed”; rather, the “the doing is everything.” This article gives reasons to think this interpretation is incorrect. The relevant passage (GM I:13) offers a stylistic flourish to elucidate a view of agency belonging to the warrior-nobles. The second concerns why these warrior-nobles come to assent to “slavish” values at all. Exploring Nietzsche’s functional claims about power, this article demonstrates another normative sphere at some level recognized and revered by the warrior-nobles, which allows them to consider the priests as rivals. Priestly spirituality, as an alternative mode of empowerment, tracks different conceptions of value.

The Journal of Nietzsche StudiesVol. 56(2)
Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.