Modelling the Variability in Immunity Build-Up and Waning Following RNA-Based Vaccination

RNA-based vaccination has been broadly applied in the COVID-19 pandemic. A characteristic of the immunization was fast-waning immunity. However, the time scale of this process varied considerably for virus subtypes and among individuals. Understanding the origin of this variability is crucial in order to improve future vaccination strategies. Here, we introduce a mathematical model of RNA-based vaccination and the kinetics of the induced immune response. In the model, antigens produced following vaccination give rise to an immune response leading to germinal center reactions and accordingly B-cell differentiation into memory B-cells and plasma cells. In a negative feedback loop, the antibodies synthesized by newly specified plasma cells shut down the germinal center reaction as well as antigen-induced differentiation of memory B-cell into plasma cells. This limits the build-up of long-lasting immunity and thus is accompanied by fast-waning immunity. The detailed data available on infection with and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 enabled computational simulation of essential processes of the immune response. Through simulation, we analyzed to what extent a single- or double-dose vaccination provides protection against infection. We find that variability in the immune response in individuals, originating, e.g., in different immune-cell densities, results in a broad log-normal-like distribution of the vaccine-induced protection times that peaks around 100 days. Protection times decrease for virus variants with mutated antibody-binding sites or increased replication rates. Independent of these virus specifics, our simulations suggest optimal timing of a second dose about 5 weeks after the first in agreement with clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Viruses
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/v17121643
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling the Variability in Immunity Build-Up and Waning Following RNA-Based Vaccination

Juan Antonio R. Magalang, Joerg Galle, Tyll Krueger
Viruses
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Modelling the Variability in Immunity Build-Up and Waning Following RNA-Based Vaccination

Juan Antonio R. Magalang, Joerg Galle, Tyll Krueger
article en

Abstract

RNA-based vaccination has been broadly applied in the COVID-19 pandemic. A characteristic of the immunization was fast-waning immunity. However, the time scale of this process varied considerably for virus subtypes and among individuals. Understanding the origin of this variability is crucial in order to improve future vaccination strategies. Here, we introduce a mathematical model of RNA-based vaccination and the kinetics of the induced immune response. In the model, antigens produced following vaccination give rise to an immune response leading to germinal center reactions and accordingly B-cell differentiation into memory B-cells and plasma cells. In a negative feedback loop, the antibodies synthesized by newly specified plasma cells shut down the germinal center reaction as well as antigen-induced differentiation of memory B-cell into plasma cells. This limits the build-up of long-lasting immunity and thus is accompanied by fast-waning immunity. The detailed data available on infection with and vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 enabled computational simulation of essential processes of the immune response. Through simulation, we analyzed to what extent a single- or double-dose vaccination provides protection against infection. We find that variability in the immune response in individuals, originating, e.g., in different immune-cell densities, results in a broad log-normal-like distribution of the vaccine-induced protection times that peaks around 100 days. Protection times decrease for virus variants with mutated antibody-binding sites or increased replication rates. Independent of these virus specifics, our simulations suggest optimal timing of a second dose about 5 weeks after the first in agreement with clinical trials.

VirusesVol. 17(12)
University of Bern (CH), Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), University Hospital of Bern (CH), AGH University of Krakow (PL), Leipzig University (DE)
University of Bern, Universität Leipzig
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.