The Application and Performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models in the Diagnosis, Classification, and Prediction of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing healthcare across multiple areas, and periodontology is no exception to this emerging trend. This systematic study sought to rigorously assess the applicability and efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the diagnosis, classification, and prediction of periodontal diseases. <b>Methods</b>: A web-based search was performed across many reputable databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library. Articles published between January 2000 and January 2025 were included in the search. Following the application of the inclusion criteria, 33 publications were selected for critical analysis utilizing QUADAS-2, and their certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE technique. <b>Results</b>: The primary applications of AI technology include the diagnosis, classification, and grading of periodontal diseases; diagnosis of gingivitis; evaluation of the radiographic alveolar bone level and degree of alveolar bone loss; and prediction of periodontal disease risk. The AI models utilized in these studies outperformed current clinical methods in diagnosing, classifying, and predicting periodontal diseases, demonstrating a superior level of precision and accuracy. Their accuracies ranged from 73% to 99.4%, their sensitivities from 75% to 100%, and their precisions from 56% to 99.5%. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI has a lot of potential to help with periodontal diagnosis and risk assessment. Its performance is often similar to or better than that of traditional clinical approaches. But before it can be used widely in clinical settings, problems with the quality of the dataset, its generalizability, its interpretability, and its acceptance by regulators must be solved. AI should be seen as a tool that helps doctors make better decisions and not as a way to replace their knowledge and skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15243247
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Application and Performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models in the Diagnosis, Classification, and Prediction of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Shareef Alqahtani, Prabhadevi C. Maganur, Khalid Hakami, Abdullah Hakami et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
article

The Application and Performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models in the Diagnosis, Classification, and Prediction of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review

Shareef Alqahtani, Prabhadevi C. Maganur, Khalid Hakami, Abdullah Hakami, Wael Ibraheem, Mohammed Jafer, Satish Vishwanathaiah, Sanjeev B. Khanagar, Tazeen Dawood, Khaled Ageely, Ali E. Abbas, Muteb Safar Aldosari, Turki Khurayzi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing healthcare across multiple areas, and periodontology is no exception to this emerging trend. This systematic study sought to rigorously assess the applicability and efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the diagnosis, classification, and prediction of periodontal diseases. <b>Methods</b>: A web-based search was performed across many reputable databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Saudi Digital Library. Articles published between January 2000 and January 2025 were included in the search. Following the application of the inclusion criteria, 33 publications were selected for critical analysis utilizing QUADAS-2, and their certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE technique. <b>Results</b>: The primary applications of AI technology include the diagnosis, classification, and grading of periodontal diseases; diagnosis of gingivitis; evaluation of the radiographic alveolar bone level and degree of alveolar bone loss; and prediction of periodontal disease risk. The AI models utilized in these studies outperformed current clinical methods in diagnosing, classifying, and predicting periodontal diseases, demonstrating a superior level of precision and accuracy. Their accuracies ranged from 73% to 99.4%, their sensitivities from 75% to 100%, and their precisions from 56% to 99.5%. <b>Conclusions</b>: AI has a lot of potential to help with periodontal diagnosis and risk assessment. Its performance is often similar to or better than that of traditional clinical approaches. But before it can be used widely in clinical settings, problems with the quality of the dataset, its generalizability, its interpretability, and its acceptance by regulators must be solved. AI should be seen as a tool that helps doctors make better decisions and not as a way to replace their knowledge and skills.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(24)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Saud University (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), Riyadh Elm University (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.