Impact of Speed and Differential Correction Base Type on Mobile Mapping System Accuracy

Mobile Mapping Systems (MMSs) have emerged as indispensable instruments for producing high-precision road maps in recent years. Despite incorporating modern devices, their efficacy may be influenced by operational variables such as vehicle speed or the type of GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) differential correction employed. This study assesses the impact of varying vehicle speeds and differential correction settings on the accuracy of point grids acquired with an MMS on a two-lane rural road. The experiment was performed across a 7 km distance, incorporating two speeds (40 and 60 km/h) and two travel directions. Three correction methodologies were examined: a proximate local base (MBS), a network station solution of the National Geographic Institute (NET), and virtual reference stations (VRSs). The methodology encompassed normality analysis, descriptive statistics, mean comparisons, one- and two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the computation of the root mean square error (RMSE) as a measure of accuracy. The findings indicate that horizontal discrepancies remain steady and unaffected by the correction technique; however, notable changes are seen in the vertical component, with the NET option proving to be the most effective. The acquisition rate is the primary determinant, exacerbating errors at 60 km/h. In conclusion, the dependability of MMS surveys is contingent upon the correction approach and operational conditions, and it is advisable to sustain moderate speeds to guarantee precise three-dimensional models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17244064
Primary Topic
GNSS positioning and interference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Speed and Differential Correction Base Type on Mobile Mapping System Accuracy

Luis Iglesias, Serafín López-Cuervo Medina, María Castro, Roberto Rodríguez-Solano
Remote Sensing
GNSS positioning and interference
article

Impact of Speed and Differential Correction Base Type on Mobile Mapping System Accuracy

Luis Iglesias, Serafín López-Cuervo Medina, María Castro, Roberto Rodríguez-Solano
article en

Abstract

Mobile Mapping Systems (MMSs) have emerged as indispensable instruments for producing high-precision road maps in recent years. Despite incorporating modern devices, their efficacy may be influenced by operational variables such as vehicle speed or the type of GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) differential correction employed. This study assesses the impact of varying vehicle speeds and differential correction settings on the accuracy of point grids acquired with an MMS on a two-lane rural road. The experiment was performed across a 7 km distance, incorporating two speeds (40 and 60 km/h) and two travel directions. Three correction methodologies were examined: a proximate local base (MBS), a network station solution of the National Geographic Institute (NET), and virtual reference stations (VRSs). The methodology encompassed normality analysis, descriptive statistics, mean comparisons, one- and two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the computation of the root mean square error (RMSE) as a measure of accuracy. The findings indicate that horizontal discrepancies remain steady and unaffected by the correction technique; however, notable changes are seen in the vertical component, with the NET option proving to be the most effective. The acquisition rate is the primary determinant, exacerbating errors at 60 km/h. In conclusion, the dependability of MMS surveys is contingent upon the correction approach and operational conditions, and it is advisable to sustain moderate speeds to guarantee precise three-dimensional models.

Remote SensingVol. 17(24)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
GNSS positioning and interference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.