Fish Consumption and the Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to assess the association between fish consumption and the risk of general and pregnancy-related depression, with implications for public health promotion. <b>Methods</b>: We retrieved 5074 articles from PubMed and Embase through November 2023 and included 35 observational studies in the analysis. We synthesized effect estimates as relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Additional dose-response analyses and stratified subgroup analyses were performed. <b>Results</b>: A significant inverse association was found between fish consumption and depression risk (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.86). A similar association was observed for pregnancy-related depression (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.89). Stratified analyses showed that only studies with fish intake ≥ 68.4 g/day demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in depression risk (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.84), whereas studies with lower intake (<68.4 g/day) showed no significant association (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-1.01), suggesting a potential threshold effect. Dose-response analysis further supported a 6% reduction in depression risk per 15 g/day increase in fish intake. <b>Conclusions</b>: This meta-analysis supports fish consumption as a modifiable factor for depression prevention, with ≥68.4 g/day as a possible threshold, potentially informing dietary guidelines and public health strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243965
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fish Consumption and the Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Eunje Kim, Youjin Je
Nutrients
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Fish Consumption and the Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Eunje Kim, Youjin Je
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies aimed to assess the association between fish consumption and the risk of general and pregnancy-related depression, with implications for public health promotion. <b>Methods</b>: We retrieved 5074 articles from PubMed and Embase through November 2023 and included 35 observational studies in the analysis. We synthesized effect estimates as relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Additional dose-response analyses and stratified subgroup analyses were performed. <b>Results</b>: A significant inverse association was found between fish consumption and depression risk (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.86). A similar association was observed for pregnancy-related depression (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69-0.89). Stratified analyses showed that only studies with fish intake ≥ 68.4 g/day demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in depression risk (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.84), whereas studies with lower intake (<68.4 g/day) showed no significant association (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.69-1.01), suggesting a potential threshold effect. Dose-response analysis further supported a 6% reduction in depression risk per 15 g/day increase in fish intake. <b>Conclusions</b>: This meta-analysis supports fish consumption as a modifiable factor for depression prevention, with ≥68.4 g/day as a possible threshold, potentially informing dietary guidelines and public health strategies.

NutrientsVol. 17(24)
Kyung Hee University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.