Partner Ethnicity and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> Despite significant advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), disparities in clinical outcomes persist. While patient-related factors are well-studied, the role of partner ethnicity remains understudied. We hypothesized that partner ethnicity affects ART outcomes. This study examined the association between partner ethnicity and ART outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients and their partners undergoing IVF treatment in the United Kingdom between 2017 and 2018. The exposure was partner ethnicity. Outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using multivariable regression models to estimate the association between partner ethnicity and IVF outcomes, adjusting for female patient age, partner age, patient ethnicity, gravidity, infertility diagnosis, treatment type, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, and number of prior in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. <b>Results:</b> Among 158,813 IVF cycles, live birth rates per cycle were 26.3% for couples with White partners and 23.1% for those with non-White partners. Non-White partners were associated with a 5% lower clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) and a 6% lower live birth rate (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Specifically, Black (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87) and Asian (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.76) partners had significantly reduced live birth rates, though these associations were attenuated after adjusting for patient ethnicity. Couples in which both the partner and patient were Black or Asian had 24-42% lower live birth rates compared with White couples (Black: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.82; Asian: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68). <b>Conclusions:</b> Partner ethnicity is independently associated with IVF outcomes, with non-White partners showing lower rates of these outcomes. These findings suggest the clinical relevance of partner ethnicity in reproductive outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248962
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partner Ethnicity and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Justin Tan, Seang Lin Tan, Michael H. Dahan, Yu Lu et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Partner Ethnicity and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Justin Tan, Seang Lin Tan, Michael H. Dahan, Yu Lu, Shu Qin Wei, Mingju Cao
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Despite significant advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), disparities in clinical outcomes persist. While patient-related factors are well-studied, the role of partner ethnicity remains understudied. We hypothesized that partner ethnicity affects ART outcomes. This study examined the association between partner ethnicity and ART outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients and their partners undergoing IVF treatment in the United Kingdom between 2017 and 2018. The exposure was partner ethnicity. Outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth. We calculated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using multivariable regression models to estimate the association between partner ethnicity and IVF outcomes, adjusting for female patient age, partner age, patient ethnicity, gravidity, infertility diagnosis, treatment type, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, and number of prior in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. <b>Results:</b> Among 158,813 IVF cycles, live birth rates per cycle were 26.3% for couples with White partners and 23.1% for those with non-White partners. Non-White partners were associated with a 5% lower clinical pregnancy rate (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97) and a 6% lower live birth rate (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Specifically, Black (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87) and Asian (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.76) partners had significantly reduced live birth rates, though these associations were attenuated after adjusting for patient ethnicity. Couples in which both the partner and patient were Black or Asian had 24-42% lower live birth rates compared with White couples (Black: RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.82; Asian: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.49-0.68). <b>Conclusions:</b> Partner ethnicity is independently associated with IVF outcomes, with non-White partners showing lower rates of these outcomes. These findings suggest the clinical relevance of partner ethnicity in reproductive outcomes. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(24)
Ottawa Fertility Centre (CA), CReATe Fertility Centre (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.