Analyzing Natural Disaster Risk Factors in Engineering Projects: A Social Networks Analysis Approach

Natural disasters pose significant risks to engineering projects, necessitating a systematic analysis of their risk factors. This study focuses on identifying and mapping these factors using a mixed-methods approach that integrates a qualitative literature review with scientometric analysis via Social Network Analysis (SNA). Through a meta-analysis of 81 peer-reviewed articles from Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, the qualitative review establishes a comprehensive list and classification of 48 natural disaster risk factors, categorized into geological, climatic, hydrological, topographic, and biological groups, while providing a theoretical foundation. SNA complements this by quantifying co-occurrence frequencies, centrality metrics (degree, betweenness, and eigenvector), and network structures, revealing dynamic interactions, key influential factors, and research gaps—particularly in under-explored areas like hydrological hazards, extreme temperatures, lightning storms, and temperature variations—that qualitative methods alone might miss. This multi-perspective integration highlights discrepancies between theoretical discussions and practical applications, underscoring overlooked cascading effects. Findings emphasize the absence of an integrated model for all 48 factors, urging the development of a holistic predictive framework to bolster disaster resilience. Theoretically, the study offers a novel SNA-based quantification of factor importance and interrelations, addressing literature fragmentation. Practically, it guides project managers in prioritizing risks for optimized design, resource allocation, and prevention strategies. Future research should incorporate real-time data sources to refine this framework for enhanced risk management in engineering projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10120352
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Natural Disaster Risk Factors in Engineering Projects: A Social Networks Analysis Approach

Jun Wang, Qing Gu
1 citations
Infrastructures
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
article

Analyzing Natural Disaster Risk Factors in Engineering Projects: A Social Networks Analysis Approach

Jun Wang, Qing Gu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Natural disasters pose significant risks to engineering projects, necessitating a systematic analysis of their risk factors. This study focuses on identifying and mapping these factors using a mixed-methods approach that integrates a qualitative literature review with scientometric analysis via Social Network Analysis (SNA). Through a meta-analysis of 81 peer-reviewed articles from Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, the qualitative review establishes a comprehensive list and classification of 48 natural disaster risk factors, categorized into geological, climatic, hydrological, topographic, and biological groups, while providing a theoretical foundation. SNA complements this by quantifying co-occurrence frequencies, centrality metrics (degree, betweenness, and eigenvector), and network structures, revealing dynamic interactions, key influential factors, and research gaps—particularly in under-explored areas like hydrological hazards, extreme temperatures, lightning storms, and temperature variations—that qualitative methods alone might miss. This multi-perspective integration highlights discrepancies between theoretical discussions and practical applications, underscoring overlooked cascading effects. Findings emphasize the absence of an integrated model for all 48 factors, urging the development of a holistic predictive framework to bolster disaster resilience. Theoretically, the study offers a novel SNA-based quantification of factor importance and interrelations, addressing literature fragmentation. Practically, it guides project managers in prioritizing risks for optimized design, resource allocation, and prevention strategies. Future research should incorporate real-time data sources to refine this framework for enhanced risk management in engineering projects.

InfrastructuresVol. 10(12)
Qingdao University of Technology (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.