Uncovering inequalities in new knowledge learning by large language models across different languages
As large language models (LLMs) gradually demonstrate their potential to boost productivity and become integral tools for problem-solving in daily life worldwide, understanding the linguistic inequalities they introduce is becoming increasingly important. Prior research has primarily focused on static analyses of disparities in existing knowledge and capabilities of LLMs across languages. However, LLMs are continuously evolving, acquiring new knowledge to provide current, relevant responses and deliver precise, expert-level answers in specific domains. Investigating linguistic inequalities within this dynamic learning process is, therefore, also essential. In this paper, we explore inequalities in new knowledge learning by LLMs across different languages and four key dimensions: effectiveness, transferability, prioritization, and robustness. Through extensive experiments in both in-context learning and fine-tuning settings, with proprietary and open-source models, we reveal four key findings: 1) LLMs face greater challenges in efficiently and accurately learning new knowledge in lower-resource languages; 2) knowledge learned by LLMs tends to be more easily transferred to higher-resource languages than to lower-resource ones; 3) new knowledge in higher-resource languages is more likely to be retained and prioritized; and 4) LLMs are more robust against incorrect or misleading information in higher-resource languages. We further analyze the underlying causes of these inequalities from linguistic perspectives, pretraining characteristics, and tokenizer design, and propose a preliminary mitigation strategy through the lens of linguistic neurons. This work highlights the urgent need to recognize and address emerging linguistic inequalities in the development of LLMs.
Authors
- Pengjun Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5373-5551)
- Sunayana Sitaram (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-9719)
- Yueqi Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5169-3180)
- Junming Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-4090)
- Zhaoya Gong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-3466)
- Yu Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-8620)
- Haoyu Tang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-2513)
- Jina Suh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-5563)
- Fangzhao Wu
- Chenglong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-9214)
- Xiyuan Yang
- Xing Xie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3257-3077)
Institutions
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
- Princeton University (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Ministry of Natural Resources (CN)
- Jiangsu Provincial Urban Planning and Design Institute (CN)
- Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
- Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (CN)
- China Academy of Urban Planning and Design (CN)
- Center for Social Sciences (GE)
- Microsoft Research (India) (IN)
- Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN)
- Institute of Contemporary History (SI)
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA)
- Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of International Relations (CN)
- Renmin University of China (CN)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2025-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2514626122
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- ICT in Developing Communities
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.98