No home team bias in elite football referees: Assessing correctness of refereeing decisions in the English Premier League

It is unclear whether referee decisions contribute to home advantage in football. This ambiguity stems from significant advancements in the development and training of officials, methodological limitations, such as the use of regression models to provide estimates, in extant research, and team behaviours. Thus, there may appear to be a bias when there is none. This study aimed to establish whether referees contribute to home advantage in elite football. Decisions (N = 4,201) from 172 games from the English Premier League 2022/23 season were analysed by 43 qualified football referees, with two officials allocated to each fixture. The referees independently assessed free-kicks, yellow cards, red cards, penalty kicks and non-whistled penalty kicks given by the on-field official using clips from WyScout. Decisions were recorded as ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect’ in unanimous cases, or ‘disputed’ if the two officials did not agree. Data from the free-kick and yellow card categories were considered suitable for analysis and compared using a series of linear mixed-effects models. There were no significant differences found between home and away teams for correct, disputed, and incorrect decisions, showing that neither team were differentially favoured by the referee, and therefore their decisions could not contribute to home advantage. Findings support the efficacy of referee development and the territoriality model’s explanation of home advantage in professional football.

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sport and Exercise Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36905/jses.2025.02.05
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No home team bias in elite football referees: Assessing correctness of refereeing decisions in the English Premier League

The Journal of Sport and Exercise Science
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

No home team bias in elite football referees: Assessing correctness of refereeing decisions in the English Premier League

article en

Abstract

It is unclear whether referee decisions contribute to home advantage in football. This ambiguity stems from significant advancements in the development and training of officials, methodological limitations, such as the use of regression models to provide estimates, in extant research, and team behaviours. Thus, there may appear to be a bias when there is none. This study aimed to establish whether referees contribute to home advantage in elite football. Decisions (N = 4,201) from 172 games from the English Premier League 2022/23 season were analysed by 43 qualified football referees, with two officials allocated to each fixture. The referees independently assessed free-kicks, yellow cards, red cards, penalty kicks and non-whistled penalty kicks given by the on-field official using clips from WyScout. Decisions were recorded as ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect’ in unanimous cases, or ‘disputed’ if the two officials did not agree. Data from the free-kick and yellow card categories were considered suitable for analysis and compared using a series of linear mixed-effects models. There were no significant differences found between home and away teams for correct, disputed, and incorrect decisions, showing that neither team were differentially favoured by the referee, and therefore their decisions could not contribute to home advantage. Findings support the efficacy of referee development and the territoriality model’s explanation of home advantage in professional football.

The Journal of Sport and Exercise ScienceVol. 9(2)
Manchester Metropolitan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.