ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production

Complex livestock production problems are barriers to achieving long-term sustainability and profitability. Mathematical nutrition models are an integral component of daily livestock feeding systems, as they help improve animal performance, productivity, and environmental sustainability while maintaining or reducing costs. Different actors, such as research institutions, single-owner farmers or ranchers, integrated livestock producers, or technology providers, have different needs for mathematical models. Many actors use spreadsheets and existing empirical models for nutrition and management, while others use mechanistic, dynamic, or artificial intelligence models. Regardless of model type, understanding the complexity of livestock systems is important, especially as many modeling projects often fail to give new insights to experienced actors within these systems. Flight simulators, also known as decision support tools, help identify high-leverage solutions while causing learning that leads to insight. However, understanding interrelationships between the parts of a system is difficult because intended and unintended consequences are often delayed. Our article reviews the pipeline of developing a flight simulator and contextualizes it within relevant technological-economic-agriculture issues, such as the growing use of precision livestock farming and associated cyberinfrastructure concerns. Fully documented and easy-to-use flight simulators provide a means to introduce stakeholders (actors) to a methodology for generating insights, as users design and run model scenarios for themselves, thereby challenging their mental models. This experiential learning is often more impactful (compared with someone telling them) because insight is gained as the actors challenge their own mental models through inductively or deductively assessing equations, parameters, and outcomes. As precision livestock technology increases on-farm, so do the intended and unintended consequences of data collection, maintenance, model development, deployment, and scale for enhancing animal production. Flight simulators help actors anticipate desired reinforcing actions such as increasing efficiencies and balancing actions within systems that slow the growth of efficiencies such as new training, labor, or infrastructure to manage large datasets or cyberinfrastructure concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf440
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production

E. M. Palmer, Young Chang, Hossein Moradi Rekabdarkolaee, Hector M Menendez et al.
1 citations
Journal of Animal Science
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
1.19
article

ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: the importance of animal science flight simulators to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of livestock production

E. M. Palmer, Young Chang, Hossein Moradi Rekabdarkolaee, Hector M Menendez, Luis Orlindo Tedeschi, Ira Lloyd Parsons, Benjamin L. Turner, Aletta L Husmann, Elias R Velasquez Moreno, Federica La Manna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Complex livestock production problems are barriers to achieving long-term sustainability and profitability. Mathematical nutrition models are an integral component of daily livestock feeding systems, as they help improve animal performance, productivity, and environmental sustainability while maintaining or reducing costs. Different actors, such as research institutions, single-owner farmers or ranchers, integrated livestock producers, or technology providers, have different needs for mathematical models. Many actors use spreadsheets and existing empirical models for nutrition and management, while others use mechanistic, dynamic, or artificial intelligence models. Regardless of model type, understanding the complexity of livestock systems is important, especially as many modeling projects often fail to give new insights to experienced actors within these systems. Flight simulators, also known as decision support tools, help identify high-leverage solutions while causing learning that leads to insight. However, understanding interrelationships between the parts of a system is difficult because intended and unintended consequences are often delayed. Our article reviews the pipeline of developing a flight simulator and contextualizes it within relevant technological-economic-agriculture issues, such as the growing use of precision livestock farming and associated cyberinfrastructure concerns. Fully documented and easy-to-use flight simulators provide a means to introduce stakeholders (actors) to a methodology for generating insights, as users design and run model scenarios for themselves, thereby challenging their mental models. This experiential learning is often more impactful (compared with someone telling them) because insight is gained as the actors challenge their own mental models through inductively or deductively assessing equations, parameters, and outcomes. As precision livestock technology increases on-farm, so do the intended and unintended consequences of data collection, maintenance, model development, deployment, and scale for enhancing animal production. Flight simulators help actors anticipate desired reinforcing actions such as increasing efficiencies and balancing actions within systems that slow the growth of efficiencies such as new training, labor, or infrastructure to manage large datasets or cyberinfrastructure concerns.

Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 104
Dakota State University (US), Buskerud University College (NO), Bowling Green State University (US), South Dakota State University (US), Texas A&M University – Kingsville (US), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Texas A&M University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.