The Development of an Automated Fluid Infusion Management System to Prevent Hypotension During General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to develop and evaluate an automated fluid infusion management system for preventing hypotension during general anesthesia. <b>Methods:</b> This study was a single-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, clinical trial. Seventy-nine patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either an automatic group or a manual group. In the automatic group, the infusion rate was automatically adjusted based on stroke volume (SV) and effective arterial elastance (Ea), whereas in the manual group, the attending anesthesiologist manually adjusted the infusion rate according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time during anesthesia that mean arterial pressure (Pm) was maintained at ≥65 mmHg. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of time the estimated stroke volume index (esSVI) was below the threshold, total fluid volume administered, total phenylephrine dose, urine output, blood loss, and average estimated stroke volume variation (esSVV). <b>Results:</b> The results demonstrated non-inferiority of the automatic group to the manual group in maintaining Pm ≥ 65 mmHg (automatic group: 82.0 ± 12.7%, manual group: 79.9 ± 15.7%; difference [automatic group-manual group]: 2.0 percentage points; one-sided 97.5% CI lower limit: -4.7%; non-inferiority margin: -5%). There were no significant differences between the groups in total fluid volume, phenylephrine dose, urine output, or blood loss. No severe adverse events or device-related adverse events were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> The automated system maintained intraoperative blood pressure safely and effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248952
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development of an Automated Fluid Infusion Management System to Prevent Hypotension During General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Shuko Matsuda, Yuka Matsuki, Yukie Mizuta, Ken Yamaura et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

The Development of an Automated Fluid Infusion Management System to Prevent Hypotension During General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Shuko Matsuda, Yuka Matsuki, Yukie Mizuta, Ken Yamaura, Kenji Shigemi, Kyosuke Nishio, Midoriko Higashi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to develop and evaluate an automated fluid infusion management system for preventing hypotension during general anesthesia. <b>Methods:</b> This study was a single-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, clinical trial. Seventy-nine patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either an automatic group or a manual group. In the automatic group, the infusion rate was automatically adjusted based on stroke volume (SV) and effective arterial elastance (Ea), whereas in the manual group, the attending anesthesiologist manually adjusted the infusion rate according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time during anesthesia that mean arterial pressure (Pm) was maintained at ≥65 mmHg. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of time the estimated stroke volume index (esSVI) was below the threshold, total fluid volume administered, total phenylephrine dose, urine output, blood loss, and average estimated stroke volume variation (esSVV). <b>Results:</b> The results demonstrated non-inferiority of the automatic group to the manual group in maintaining Pm ≥ 65 mmHg (automatic group: 82.0 ± 12.7%, manual group: 79.9 ± 15.7%; difference [automatic group-manual group]: 2.0 percentage points; one-sided 97.5% CI lower limit: -4.7%; non-inferiority margin: -5%). There were no significant differences between the groups in total fluid volume, phenylephrine dose, urine output, or blood loss. No severe adverse events or device-related adverse events were observed. <b>Conclusions:</b> The automated system maintained intraoperative blood pressure safely and effectively.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(24)
Kyushu University (JP), Maizuru Municipal Hospital (JP), University of Fukui Hospital (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, University of Fukui
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.