Transimperial Opportunities?

This introduction to the special issue Transimperial Opportunities? Small State Colonisation of Congo (1876-1940) reinterprets Congo’s colonial history through a transimperial lens, situating it within wider debates on pan-European empire and small state imperialisms. Moving beyond Belgian-centred national frameworks and ‘Great Power’ biases, it reveals how tensions between nationalisation and internationalisation shaped transimperial practices and relations and vice versa. The issue examines how actors and institutions from states with diminishing or limited imperial leverage – such as the Netherlands, Finland, and Luxembourg – engaged in, shaped, and contested the colonisation of Congo. Demonstrating how transimperial opportunities both motivated and complicated joint colonial projects, it analyses how so-called small state actors navigated, benefited from, and negotiated imperial hierarchies. By foregrounding transimperial collaboration and competition, the issue positions colonial Congo as a key site for understanding tensions in the co-production of (pan-European) colonial policies, identities, and structures across borders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51769/bmgn-lchr.22632
Primary Topic
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transimperial Opportunities?

Eline Ceulemans, Janne Schreurs
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
article

Transimperial Opportunities?

Eline Ceulemans, Janne Schreurs
article en

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue Transimperial Opportunities? Small State Colonisation of Congo (1876-1940) reinterprets Congo’s colonial history through a transimperial lens, situating it within wider debates on pan-European empire and small state imperialisms. Moving beyond Belgian-centred national frameworks and ‘Great Power’ biases, it reveals how tensions between nationalisation and internationalisation shaped transimperial practices and relations and vice versa. The issue examines how actors and institutions from states with diminishing or limited imperial leverage – such as the Netherlands, Finland, and Luxembourg – engaged in, shaped, and contested the colonisation of Congo. Demonstrating how transimperial opportunities both motivated and complicated joint colonial projects, it analyses how so-called small state actors navigated, benefited from, and negotiated imperial hierarchies. By foregrounding transimperial collaboration and competition, the issue positions colonial Congo as a key site for understanding tensions in the co-production of (pan-European) colonial policies, identities, and structures across borders.

BMGN - Low Countries Historical ReviewVol. 140(4)
University of Antwerp (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
German Colonialism and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.