Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study

This research was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, lesion detection, and clinical management impact of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Participants with confirmed or suspected ccRCC diagnoses were prospectively included in our study. All patients underwent 18F-FAP-2286 and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The evaluation of diagnostic performance was conducted utilizing pathology and clinical follow-up as the reference standards. The quantitative analysis included the SUVmax, TBR, FTV/MTV, and TLF/TLG. Twenty-two patients with initial stage (n = 20)/recurrent (n = 2) ccRCC underwent 18F-FAP-2286 and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT had a greater TBR for primary ccRCC lesions [2.8 (1.9–5.4) vs.1.6 (1.1–3.8); P = 0.019], whereas the SUVmax did not significantly differ [8.4 (4.7–17.2) vs.6.6 (4.9–19.4); P = 0.965]. With respect to metastatic lymph nodes, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT had a higher SUVmax [13.7 (10.8–18.3) vs. 11.0 (7.3–16.4); P = 0.043] and TBR [10.4 (8.0-13.3) vs. 5.7 (3.4–8.7); P<0.001]. For distant metastases, the detection rates of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for lung metastases, liver metastases, and bone metastases were 96.9% (94/97) and 83.5% (81/97) (P = 0.002), 100% (5/5) and 80% (4/5), and 97.2% (35/36) and 80.6% (29/36) (P = 0.042), respectively. 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT revealed additional lesions, led to upstaging of T or M stage in 18.18% (4/22) of patients, resulting in treatment escalation in 4/22 patients. In this head-to-head comparison, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT demonstrated superior performance for detecting primary and metastatic ccRCC lesions and provided more accurate TNM staging, significantly impacting clinical management. Interpretation should consider limitations, notably its exploratory sample size and reliance on imaging follow-up for confirming metastases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07650-z
Primary Topic
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study

Xuena Li, Y. Liu, Shu Wang, Xuefei Li et al.
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
article

Head-to-head comparison of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study

Xuena Li, Y. Liu, Shu Wang, Xuefei Li, Yan Cui, Yaming Li
article en

Abstract

This research was designed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, lesion detection, and clinical management impact of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Participants with confirmed or suspected ccRCC diagnoses were prospectively included in our study. All patients underwent 18F-FAP-2286 and 18F-FDG PET/CT. The evaluation of diagnostic performance was conducted utilizing pathology and clinical follow-up as the reference standards. The quantitative analysis included the SUVmax, TBR, FTV/MTV, and TLF/TLG. Twenty-two patients with initial stage (n = 20)/recurrent (n = 2) ccRCC underwent 18F-FAP-2286 and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT had a greater TBR for primary ccRCC lesions [2.8 (1.9–5.4) vs.1.6 (1.1–3.8); P = 0.019], whereas the SUVmax did not significantly differ [8.4 (4.7–17.2) vs.6.6 (4.9–19.4); P = 0.965]. With respect to metastatic lymph nodes, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT had a higher SUVmax [13.7 (10.8–18.3) vs. 11.0 (7.3–16.4); P = 0.043] and TBR [10.4 (8.0-13.3) vs. 5.7 (3.4–8.7); P<0.001]. For distant metastases, the detection rates of 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for lung metastases, liver metastases, and bone metastases were 96.9% (94/97) and 83.5% (81/97) (P = 0.002), 100% (5/5) and 80% (4/5), and 97.2% (35/36) and 80.6% (29/36) (P = 0.042), respectively. 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT revealed additional lesions, led to upstaging of T or M stage in 18.18% (4/22) of patients, resulting in treatment escalation in 4/22 patients. In this head-to-head comparison, 18F-FAP-2286 PET/CT demonstrated superior performance for detecting primary and metastatic ccRCC lesions and provided more accurate TNM staging, significantly impacting clinical management. Interpretation should consider limitations, notably its exploratory sample size and reliance on imaging follow-up for confirming metastases.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN), First Hospital of China Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Department of Education of Liaoning Province, Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.