Modulating Phonological Short-Term Memory in Stroke Survivors With Aphasia Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

BackgroundShort-term maintenance of phonological information is critical for language production and comprehension, and is often impaired in stroke survivors with aphasia.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we investigated whether brain oscillatory activity underlying phonological short-term memory (pSTM) can be influenced by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in stroke survivors with aphasia (SWA).MethodsIn a within-subject, single-blinded, sham-controlled study, 13 SWA received theta-tACS (4-7 Hz) targeting left temporoparietal and inferior frontal regions across 3 tACS conditions (in-phase, anti-phase, and sham; 20 minutes each). Participants completed an adaptive delayed match-to-sample task with spoken consonant-vowel strings (2-8 syllables) before, during, and after stimulation. The primary outcome was change in pSTM capacity (ie, number of syllables maintained over a 5-second delay), estimated using a linear interpolation approach. We hypothesized that in-phase tACS would enhance, and anti-phase tACS would disrupt, pSTM capacity relative to sham.ResultsLME analyses reveal significant interactions between tACS condition and block (<i>F</i>(4, 91.9) = 2.65, <i>P</i> = .038), and post-hoc estimated marginal means comparisons show increased pSTM capacity during in-phase tACS versus sham (estimate = 0.71, <i>t</i>(92) = 2.26, <i>P</i> = .040) and anti-phase (estimate = 0.75, <i>t</i>(92) = 2.44, <i>P</i> = .040) conditions, only during the stimulation period. Differences between anti-phase and sham-tACS were not significant (estimate = -0.04, <i>P</i> = .901). Individual response to tACS was variable, with only 60% of SWA responding.ConclusionsThis study supports in-phase theta-tACS positively impacts pSTM. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate lasting effects to increase clinical relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251395694
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modulating Phonological Short-Term Memory in Stroke Survivors With Aphasia Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Jeffrey R. Binder, Priyanka P. Shah‐Basak, Sara B. Pillay, Katrina N. Fauser
Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Modulating Phonological Short-Term Memory in Stroke Survivors With Aphasia Using Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Jeffrey R. Binder, Priyanka P. Shah‐Basak, Sara B. Pillay, Katrina N. Fauser
article en

Abstract

BackgroundShort-term maintenance of phonological information is critical for language production and comprehension, and is often impaired in stroke survivors with aphasia.ObjectiveIn this pilot study, we investigated whether brain oscillatory activity underlying phonological short-term memory (pSTM) can be influenced by transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in stroke survivors with aphasia (SWA).MethodsIn a within-subject, single-blinded, sham-controlled study, 13 SWA received theta-tACS (4-7 Hz) targeting left temporoparietal and inferior frontal regions across 3 tACS conditions (in-phase, anti-phase, and sham; 20 minutes each). Participants completed an adaptive delayed match-to-sample task with spoken consonant-vowel strings (2-8 syllables) before, during, and after stimulation. The primary outcome was change in pSTM capacity (ie, number of syllables maintained over a 5-second delay), estimated using a linear interpolation approach. We hypothesized that in-phase tACS would enhance, and anti-phase tACS would disrupt, pSTM capacity relative to sham.ResultsLME analyses reveal significant interactions between tACS condition and block (<i>F</i>(4, 91.9) = 2.65, <i>P</i> = .038), and post-hoc estimated marginal means comparisons show increased pSTM capacity during in-phase tACS versus sham (estimate = 0.71, <i>t</i>(92) = 2.26, <i>P</i> = .040) and anti-phase (estimate = 0.75, <i>t</i>(92) = 2.44, <i>P</i> = .040) conditions, only during the stimulation period. Differences between anti-phase and sham-tACS were not significant (estimate = -0.04, <i>P</i> = .901). Individual response to tACS was variable, with only 60% of SWA responding.ConclusionsThis study supports in-phase theta-tACS positively impacts pSTM. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate lasting effects to increase clinical relevance.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repairVol. 40(2)
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.