Biomarkers in the Management of Complement-Mediated Kidney Diseases in the Era of Complement Therapeutics

Pharmacologic complement inhibition offers a promising therapeutic strategy for several complement-mediated kidney diseases. Yet, at present, nephrologists must rely on an incomplete toolkit of histopathologic and circulating biomarkers to assess complement activity in complement-mediated kidney diseases. Our clinical capacity to characterize and monitor pathologically dysregulated complement for disease prognosis, to inform patient selection, and to evaluate therapeutic efficacy severely lags behind the growing number of complement inhibitors under development. Reliable, sensitive complement biomarkers that are suitable for clinical assessment are needed for the timely and optimal implementation of existing and upcoming therapeutics. Despite this urgent need and growing research efforts, the repertoire of clinically available complement biomarker assays has proven refractory to expansion. This is, in part, due to a myriad of practical challenges limiting the information reliably interpreted from existing complement biomarkers and hindering the translation of novel biomarkers from research settings into the clinical pathology laboratory. In this article, the authors review commonly evaluated complement biomarkers within the context of an evolving therapeutic landscape, as well as the practical challenges related to their effective application. Noteworthy, emerging biomarkers are also discussed, along with the challenges in translating robust markers of complement activity from research settings into clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000967
Primary Topic
Complement system in diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarkers in the Management of Complement-Mediated Kidney Diseases in the Era of Complement Therapeutics

Dana V. Rizk, Ashley Frazer‐Abel, Melvin Chan, Bradley P. Dixon et al.
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Complement system in diseases
article

Biomarkers in the Management of Complement-Mediated Kidney Diseases in the Era of Complement Therapeutics

Dana V. Rizk, Ashley Frazer‐Abel, Melvin Chan, Bradley P. Dixon, Sydney C.W. Tang, H. Terence Cook
article en

Abstract

Pharmacologic complement inhibition offers a promising therapeutic strategy for several complement-mediated kidney diseases. Yet, at present, nephrologists must rely on an incomplete toolkit of histopathologic and circulating biomarkers to assess complement activity in complement-mediated kidney diseases. Our clinical capacity to characterize and monitor pathologically dysregulated complement for disease prognosis, to inform patient selection, and to evaluate therapeutic efficacy severely lags behind the growing number of complement inhibitors under development. Reliable, sensitive complement biomarkers that are suitable for clinical assessment are needed for the timely and optimal implementation of existing and upcoming therapeutics. Despite this urgent need and growing research efforts, the repertoire of clinically available complement biomarker assays has proven refractory to expansion. This is, in part, due to a myriad of practical challenges limiting the information reliably interpreted from existing complement biomarkers and hindering the translation of novel biomarkers from research settings into the clinical pathology laboratory. In this article, the authors review commonly evaluated complement biomarkers within the context of an evolving therapeutic landscape, as well as the practical challenges related to their effective application. Noteworthy, emerging biomarkers are also discussed, along with the challenges in translating robust markers of complement activity from research settings into clinical practice.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Queen Mary Hospital (CN), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Imperial College London (GB), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Complement system in diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.