Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Pain and Side Effects in Adults Undergoing Different Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background</b>: The present study aimed to identify the differences between experiences, in terms of oral health-related quality of life, pain, side effects and/or other complications, of adults undergoing orthodontic treatment using removable aligners and fixed labial or lingual appliances. <b>Methods</b>: The review was registered with PROSPERO, and a comprehensive electronic search was undertaken without language or date restrictions. Randomised and non-randomised trials and prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies along with case series were included. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions tools were used to assess quality. Data were grouped in terms of oral health-related quality of life, pain side effects and/or other complications. <b>Results</b>: Data from 35 studies were included; 9 were eligible for meta-analysis. Thus 2611 participants were included related to removable aligners (n = 513), fixed labial (n = 1816) and lingual (n = 218) appliances or a combination (n = 64) of appliances. The standardised mean differences in visual analogue scale pain reports between 24 h and 7 days were -10.02 (95% CI: -11.13, -8.91) for aligners and -6.40 (95%CI: -10.42, -2.38) for labial appliances (<i>p</i> = 0.09). There was a significant improvement in dental self-confidence following fixed labial appliance treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: No difference was detected in short-term pain with aligners and labial appliances. Aligners may have less impact on oral health-related quality of life measures compared to labial appliances. Lingual appliances have a persistent impact on speech, despite some adaptability. Any deterioration in oral health-related quality of life measures during treatment appears temporary. Further randomised trials using validated assessment tools and comparing aligners and labial and lingual appliances are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13243317
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Pain and Side Effects in Adults Undergoing Different Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cara Sandler, Ama Johal, Honieh Bolooki, Ben Dunne
1 citations
Healthcare
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
article

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Pain and Side Effects in Adults Undergoing Different Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cara Sandler, Ama Johal, Honieh Bolooki, Ben Dunne
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The present study aimed to identify the differences between experiences, in terms of oral health-related quality of life, pain, side effects and/or other complications, of adults undergoing orthodontic treatment using removable aligners and fixed labial or lingual appliances. <b>Methods</b>: The review was registered with PROSPERO, and a comprehensive electronic search was undertaken without language or date restrictions. Randomised and non-randomised trials and prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies along with case series were included. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 Tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies-of Interventions tools were used to assess quality. Data were grouped in terms of oral health-related quality of life, pain side effects and/or other complications. <b>Results</b>: Data from 35 studies were included; 9 were eligible for meta-analysis. Thus 2611 participants were included related to removable aligners (n = 513), fixed labial (n = 1816) and lingual (n = 218) appliances or a combination (n = 64) of appliances. The standardised mean differences in visual analogue scale pain reports between 24 h and 7 days were -10.02 (95% CI: -11.13, -8.91) for aligners and -6.40 (95%CI: -10.42, -2.38) for labial appliances (<i>p</i> = 0.09). There was a significant improvement in dental self-confidence following fixed labial appliance treatment (<i>p</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: No difference was detected in short-term pain with aligners and labial appliances. Aligners may have less impact on oral health-related quality of life measures compared to labial appliances. Lingual appliances have a persistent impact on speech, despite some adaptability. Any deterioration in oral health-related quality of life measures during treatment appears temporary. Further randomised trials using validated assessment tools and comparing aligners and labial and lingual appliances are required.

HealthcareVol. 13(24)
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.