Skin Temperature of the North Sea from an Autonomous Surface Vehicle Compared to Remote Sensing Observation

Validating satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) requires resolving spatial and vertical mismatches between remotely sensed measurements and traditional in situ observations. This study evaluates the bias between infrared-based satellite SST and high-resolution in situ measurements collected in the North Sea using the autonomous surface vehicle (ASV) HALOBATES. The ASV enables the direct sampling of the ocean skin layer via a rotating glass disc system, alongside near-surface layer (NSL, 1 m depth) measurements using a flow-through system. Across 37 missions conducted between 2022 and 2023, we quantified biases in our approach and performed match-ups with a level-4 SST product for the North and Baltic Seas. Satellite SST showed strong correlations with in situ observations (r > 0.98), with Deming regression slopes approaching unity for all platforms. Despite this agreement, satellite SST exhibited a consistent cold bias. The mean differences were −0.44 ± 0.60 °C for the skin layer and −0.40 ± 0.52 °C for the NSL. The RMSE values were 0.75 °C for the skin layer and 0.66 °C for the NSL, indicating that satellite SST more closely reflects temperatures at 1 m than those at the skin layer. These findings highlight the importance of depth-resolved in situ measurements for improving remote SST validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17244056
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skin Temperature of the North Sea from an Autonomous Surface Vehicle Compared to Remote Sensing Observation

Oliver Wurl, Lisa Gassen, Mariana Ribas‐Ribas, Samuel Mintah Ayim
Remote Sensing
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

Skin Temperature of the North Sea from an Autonomous Surface Vehicle Compared to Remote Sensing Observation

Oliver Wurl, Lisa Gassen, Mariana Ribas‐Ribas, Samuel Mintah Ayim
article en

Abstract

Validating satellite-derived sea surface temperature (SST) requires resolving spatial and vertical mismatches between remotely sensed measurements and traditional in situ observations. This study evaluates the bias between infrared-based satellite SST and high-resolution in situ measurements collected in the North Sea using the autonomous surface vehicle (ASV) HALOBATES. The ASV enables the direct sampling of the ocean skin layer via a rotating glass disc system, alongside near-surface layer (NSL, 1 m depth) measurements using a flow-through system. Across 37 missions conducted between 2022 and 2023, we quantified biases in our approach and performed match-ups with a level-4 SST product for the North and Baltic Seas. Satellite SST showed strong correlations with in situ observations (r > 0.98), with Deming regression slopes approaching unity for all platforms. Despite this agreement, satellite SST exhibited a consistent cold bias. The mean differences were −0.44 ± 0.60 °C for the skin layer and −0.40 ± 0.52 °C for the NSL. The RMSE values were 0.75 °C for the skin layer and 0.66 °C for the NSL, indicating that satellite SST more closely reflects temperatures at 1 m than those at the skin layer. These findings highlight the importance of depth-resolved in situ measurements for improving remote SST validation.

Remote SensingVol. 17(24)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Niedersächsische Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.