Reliability evaluation of radar seekers based on accelerated laboratory testing

As the critical sensing component of a missile, the radar seeker plays a decisive role in ensuring accurate target engagement. However, due to the high cost of missile systems, real-flight testing imposes significant constraints, including extensive preparation cycles and substantial resource consumption. Additionally, radar seekers are typically activated only during the terminal flight phase, resulting in limited data collection opportunities per test. Consequently, laboratory-based evaluation becomes indispensable for assessing performance and reliability. This study proposes a reliability assessment methodology grounded in accelerated laboratory testing. The method employs equivalent mission time and failure data obtained through accelerated test conditions, alongside assumed statistical distributions of radar seeker failure behavior, to estimate failur e rates. Based on the estimated failure rate and the defined mission duration of the radar seeker, the mission reliability of a single unit is derived. Thereafter, the overall system mission success probability is determined using a binary success/failure model. This approach enables the utilization of test data generated during both product development and production stages to evaluate radar seeker reliability. Furthermore, it facilitates the translation of component-level reliability metrics into system-level operational effectiveness, offering valuable support for equipment planning, ammunition stockpile management, and mission strategy formulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.3805
Primary Topic
Military Defense Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability evaluation of radar seekers based on accelerated laboratory testing

Wenhui Mei, Jun Wu, Ke‐Shi Zhang, Bo Ye
IET conference proceedings.
Military Defense Systems Analysis
article

Reliability evaluation of radar seekers based on accelerated laboratory testing

Wenhui Mei, Jun Wu, Ke‐Shi Zhang, Bo Ye
article en

Abstract

As the critical sensing component of a missile, the radar seeker plays a decisive role in ensuring accurate target engagement. However, due to the high cost of missile systems, real-flight testing imposes significant constraints, including extensive preparation cycles and substantial resource consumption. Additionally, radar seekers are typically activated only during the terminal flight phase, resulting in limited data collection opportunities per test. Consequently, laboratory-based evaluation becomes indispensable for assessing performance and reliability. This study proposes a reliability assessment methodology grounded in accelerated laboratory testing. The method employs equivalent mission time and failure data obtained through accelerated test conditions, alongside assumed statistical distributions of radar seeker failure behavior, to estimate failur e rates. Based on the estimated failure rate and the defined mission duration of the radar seeker, the mission reliability of a single unit is derived. Thereafter, the overall system mission success probability is determined using a binary success/failure model. This approach enables the utilization of test data generated during both product development and production stages to evaluate radar seeker reliability. Furthermore, it facilitates the translation of component-level reliability metrics into system-level operational effectiveness, offering valuable support for equipment planning, ammunition stockpile management, and mission strategy formulation.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2025(35)
Nanjing Institute of Technology (CN), Institute of Electronics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Military Defense Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.