Investigating and comparing user experiences at EV charging and petroleum fueling stations

Light duty electrification requires DC charging stations to take over the current role of petroleum stations. However, charging and fueling systems differ substantially in technology, user behavior, and business models. This study analyzes thousands of reviews for petroleum stations and DC charging stations. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative rating, sentiment analysis, and Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted topical classification, factors that shape user experience are identified. Charging and fueling are perceived as fundamentally different activities. Fueling reviews are dominated by fuel price and staff interaction, while charging reviews emphasize equipment reliability, location convenience, and access to nearby amenities. Manufacturer-owned charging networks are perceived more positively than open networks. Open networks suffer from small station sizes and higher outage rates which reduce effective capacity and generate negative feedback. Across networks, proximity to amenities strongly influences perceived convenience and satisfaction. These findings identify actionable pathways for improving charging experiences and perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105580
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating and comparing user experiences at EV charging and petroleum fueling stations

Vaishnavi Chaitanya Karanam, Scott Hardman, Aaron I. Rabinowitz, Sina Nordhoff et al.
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Investigating and comparing user experiences at EV charging and petroleum fueling stations

Vaishnavi Chaitanya Karanam, Scott Hardman, Aaron I. Rabinowitz, Sina Nordhoff, Gil Tal
article en

Abstract

Light duty electrification requires DC charging stations to take over the current role of petroleum stations. However, charging and fueling systems differ substantially in technology, user behavior, and business models. This study analyzes thousands of reviews for petroleum stations and DC charging stations. Using a mixed-methods approach combining quantitative rating, sentiment analysis, and Large Language Model (LLM)-assisted topical classification, factors that shape user experience are identified. Charging and fueling are perceived as fundamentally different activities. Fueling reviews are dominated by fuel price and staff interaction, while charging reviews emphasize equipment reliability, location convenience, and access to nearby amenities. Manufacturer-owned charging networks are perceived more positively than open networks. Open networks suffer from small station sizes and higher outage rates which reduce effective capacity and generate negative feedback. Across networks, proximity to amenities strongly influences perceived convenience and satisfaction. These findings identify actionable pathways for improving charging experiences and perceptions.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 160
University of California, Davis (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Investigating and comparing user experiences at EV charging and petroleum fueling stations — Vaishnavi Chaitanya Karanam, Scott Hardman, et al. · Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS