Obesity and climate change: co-crises with common solutions

The global obesity crisis involves an unprecedented and rapid change to the human phenotype. Conferring vast levels of avoidable morbidity and mortality at enormous cost, it has proved refractory to previous policy-led action. This article reviews recent developments in our understanding of obesity and its links to the climate co-crisis, aiming to inform evidence-based, societal-level actions to address both. Recent therapeutic developments now offer transformative interventions for millions of people living with obesity. However, treating all affected adults and children with major bariatric surgery or lifelong anti-obesity medication is unsustainable given the risks and costs. The obesity crisis has been driven primarily by the transformation of our food environment toward diets dominated by ultra-processed foods (UPFs) that exert multiple addictive and obesogenic mechanisms. Emerging evidence shows that not all UPFs have the same impact: processed meat and low-fiber, energy-dense UPFs are linked with poorer outcomes compared with less energy-dense, high-fiber, plant-rich UPFs, indicating that more nuanced classifications would be helpful. This food system also contributes significantly to climate change and other environmental harms, primarily through ruminant meat consumption. Both climate change and obesity are driven by unsustainable, but profitable, consumption. Solutions exist but have not been adequately implemented owing to a lack of political will. They require food system reforms that replace energy-dense UPFs with unprocessed foods and reduce animal-sourced foods. Accumulating evidence supports prioritizing actions to remove market distortions via increasing cost transparency, taxing unhealthy foods (redirecting the proceeds to public health), combating marketing, effective food labeling, facilitating healthy food choices, promoting healthy living environments, and public and professional education. New economic models, market demand shifts, and technological innovation should all be harnessed to overcome economic and political barriers, and food system reform should be integral to future actions to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. This transformation to improve both human and planetary health will require interdisciplinary scientific advocacy and coalition-building across society. During the COVID-19 pandemic, societies recognized how rapid, concerted, science-led action can effectively address a global threat; a similar societal shift is required to motivate the political action needed to address the obesity crisis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Science
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsci.2025.1613595
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obesity and climate change: co-crises with common solutions

Guy A. Rutter, Joseph Proietto, Marj Moodie, Jason C. G. Halford et al.
6 citations
Frontiers in Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
10.30
article

Obesity and climate change: co-crises with common solutions

Guy A. Rutter, Joseph Proietto, Marj Moodie, Jason C. G. Halford, Katherine Samaras, Catherine M. Champagne, Paul Behrens, Jeff M. P. Holly
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The global obesity crisis involves an unprecedented and rapid change to the human phenotype. Conferring vast levels of avoidable morbidity and mortality at enormous cost, it has proved refractory to previous policy-led action. This article reviews recent developments in our understanding of obesity and its links to the climate co-crisis, aiming to inform evidence-based, societal-level actions to address both. Recent therapeutic developments now offer transformative interventions for millions of people living with obesity. However, treating all affected adults and children with major bariatric surgery or lifelong anti-obesity medication is unsustainable given the risks and costs. The obesity crisis has been driven primarily by the transformation of our food environment toward diets dominated by ultra-processed foods (UPFs) that exert multiple addictive and obesogenic mechanisms. Emerging evidence shows that not all UPFs have the same impact: processed meat and low-fiber, energy-dense UPFs are linked with poorer outcomes compared with less energy-dense, high-fiber, plant-rich UPFs, indicating that more nuanced classifications would be helpful. This food system also contributes significantly to climate change and other environmental harms, primarily through ruminant meat consumption. Both climate change and obesity are driven by unsustainable, but profitable, consumption. Solutions exist but have not been adequately implemented owing to a lack of political will. They require food system reforms that replace energy-dense UPFs with unprocessed foods and reduce animal-sourced foods. Accumulating evidence supports prioritizing actions to remove market distortions via increasing cost transparency, taxing unhealthy foods (redirecting the proceeds to public health), combating marketing, effective food labeling, facilitating healthy food choices, promoting healthy living environments, and public and professional education. New economic models, market demand shifts, and technological innovation should all be harnessed to overcome economic and political barriers, and food system reform should be integral to future actions to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. This transformation to improve both human and planetary health will require interdisciplinary scientific advocacy and coalition-building across society. During the COVID-19 pandemic, societies recognized how rapid, concerted, science-led action can effectively address a global threat; a similar societal shift is required to motivate the political action needed to address the obesity crisis.

Frontiers in ScienceVol. 3
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Leiden University (NL), University of Leeds (GB), Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), Southmead Hospital (GB), McGill University Health Centre (CA), University of Bristol (GB), St Vincent's Hospital Sydney (AU), St Vincent's Clinic (AU), Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Science Oxford (GB), Oxford Spires Academy (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Université de Montréal (CA)
Wellcome Trust, Diabetes UK, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medical Research Council, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
10.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.