Singing Behavior and Availability of Golden-Cheeked Warblers

Incomplete detection during auditory point counts includes the component that individuals are present but silent (“availability”). If the probability of being ‘available’ is less than one and is not random with respect to time or space, population estimates that fail to address availability will be biased. I recorded minute-by-minute singing of 60 male Golden-cheeked Warblers (Setophaga chrysoparia) in 2010–2011 (133 surveys; 6517 min) to estimate availability, evaluate predictors, and provide survey guidance. The per-minute availability was 0.45 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.37–0.54). The availability was higher for unpaired versus paired males (0.82 [0.64–0.92] versus 0.30 [0.20–0.42]) and when ≥1 conspecific was singing (0.61 [0.46–0.75] vs. 0.54 [0.39–0.68]). Availability declined across both day of year and hour of day. Aggregating to common survey lengths, the probability of ≥ 1 song per bin increased with duration but showed the same temporal declines: 3 min = 0.61 (0.52–0.70), 5 min = 0.72 (0.63–0.79), and 10 min = 0.83 (0.74–0.90). Temperature had a modest positive effect, clearest at the 10 min bins. Interaction terms among day, hour, and temperature were unsupported (all likelihood ratio tests p > 0.10). These findings indicate that availability is <1 and varies predictably with day and time, implying that point count protocols should standardize survey windows or model availability explicitly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Birds
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/birds6040066
Primary Topic
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Singing Behavior and Availability of Golden-Cheeked Warblers

Jennifer L. Reidy
Birds
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
article

Singing Behavior and Availability of Golden-Cheeked Warblers

Jennifer L. Reidy
article en

Abstract

Incomplete detection during auditory point counts includes the component that individuals are present but silent (“availability”). If the probability of being ‘available’ is less than one and is not random with respect to time or space, population estimates that fail to address availability will be biased. I recorded minute-by-minute singing of 60 male Golden-cheeked Warblers (Setophaga chrysoparia) in 2010–2011 (133 surveys; 6517 min) to estimate availability, evaluate predictors, and provide survey guidance. The per-minute availability was 0.45 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.37–0.54). The availability was higher for unpaired versus paired males (0.82 [0.64–0.92] versus 0.30 [0.20–0.42]) and when ≥1 conspecific was singing (0.61 [0.46–0.75] vs. 0.54 [0.39–0.68]). Availability declined across both day of year and hour of day. Aggregating to common survey lengths, the probability of ≥ 1 song per bin increased with duration but showed the same temporal declines: 3 min = 0.61 (0.52–0.70), 5 min = 0.72 (0.63–0.79), and 10 min = 0.83 (0.74–0.90). Temperature had a modest positive effect, clearest at the 10 min bins. Interaction terms among day, hour, and temperature were unsupported (all likelihood ratio tests p > 0.10). These findings indicate that availability is <1 and varies predictably with day and time, implying that point count protocols should standardize survey windows or model availability explicitly.

BirdsVol. 6(4)
Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.