Linking the Weibull distribution to Gini coefficients: a bamboo specific framework for intra-culm leaf area inequality

Quantifying inequality in the leaf area distribution within a single module is critical for elucidating plant resource allocation strategies, but the accuracy of theoretical Gini coefficients derived from statistical distributions remains poorly validated against observed values. To resolve this gap, we analyzed 9,242 leaves from 121 culms of the bamboo <i>Semiarundinaria densiflora</i>, a model system with minimal ontogenetic noise and moderate leaf counts (36-187 leaves per culm) that enables robust Lorenz curve construction. Four candidate distributions were tested: the normal, log-normal, two-parameter Gamma, and two-parameter Weibull distributions. The parameters of the normal and log-normal distributions were estimated directly from sample statistics, whereas the parameters of the Gamma and Weibull distributions were estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Goodness of fit was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test for distributional validity, and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) for model selection. Although the Gamma distribution passed the K-S test for a slightly higher percentage of culms (99%) than the Weibull distribution (97.5%), the Weibull distribution was selected as the superior model because it yielded significantly lower AIC values. Crucially, the theoretical Gini coefficients of the Gamma and Weibull distributions (denoted as <i>G<sub>G</sub></i> and <i>G<sub>W</sub></i> , respectively) were tested against the observed Gini coefficients (<i>G<sub>P</sub></i> ) calculated nonparametrically using the polygon method. Linear regression demonstrated that <i>G<sub>W</sub></i> ​ predicted <i>G<sub>P</sub></i> with near isometric accuracy: the intercept's 95% confidence interval included zero (-0.006 to 0.017) and the slope's 95% confidence interval included unity (0.929 to 1.039). In contrast, <i>G<sub>G</sub></i> exhibited significant bias. Notably, pooling leaves across culms violated all distributions due to microhabitat driven multimodality, confirming that intra-culm inequality assessments require organism level analysis. This work provides an empirical validation that the Weibull shape parameter reliably quantifies intra-culm leaf area inequality. By bridging theoretical distribution models with field-derived inequality metrics, our approach provides insights into canopy efficiency, photosynthetic optimization, and hydraulic trade-offs. Future work should test this approach in other grass species and assess its generalizability in plants with contrasting canopy architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1685552
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linking the Weibull distribution to Gini coefficients: a bamboo specific framework for intra-culm leaf area inequality

Christian Damgaard, Zengbao Jiao, Shuai Liu, Meng Lian et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
1.75
article

Linking the Weibull distribution to Gini coefficients: a bamboo specific framework for intra-culm leaf area inequality

Christian Damgaard, Zengbao Jiao, Shuai Liu, Meng Lian, Peijian Shi, Weihao Yao, Feixue Jiang, Karl J. Niklas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Quantifying inequality in the leaf area distribution within a single module is critical for elucidating plant resource allocation strategies, but the accuracy of theoretical Gini coefficients derived from statistical distributions remains poorly validated against observed values. To resolve this gap, we analyzed 9,242 leaves from 121 culms of the bamboo <i>Semiarundinaria densiflora</i>, a model system with minimal ontogenetic noise and moderate leaf counts (36-187 leaves per culm) that enables robust Lorenz curve construction. Four candidate distributions were tested: the normal, log-normal, two-parameter Gamma, and two-parameter Weibull distributions. The parameters of the normal and log-normal distributions were estimated directly from sample statistics, whereas the parameters of the Gamma and Weibull distributions were estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Goodness of fit was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test for distributional validity, and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) for model selection. Although the Gamma distribution passed the K-S test for a slightly higher percentage of culms (99%) than the Weibull distribution (97.5%), the Weibull distribution was selected as the superior model because it yielded significantly lower AIC values. Crucially, the theoretical Gini coefficients of the Gamma and Weibull distributions (denoted as <i>G<sub>G</sub></i> and <i>G<sub>W</sub></i> , respectively) were tested against the observed Gini coefficients (<i>G<sub>P</sub></i> ) calculated nonparametrically using the polygon method. Linear regression demonstrated that <i>G<sub>W</sub></i> ​ predicted <i>G<sub>P</sub></i> with near isometric accuracy: the intercept's 95% confidence interval included zero (-0.006 to 0.017) and the slope's 95% confidence interval included unity (0.929 to 1.039). In contrast, <i>G<sub>G</sub></i> exhibited significant bias. Notably, pooling leaves across culms violated all distributions due to microhabitat driven multimodality, confirming that intra-culm inequality assessments require organism level analysis. This work provides an empirical validation that the Weibull shape parameter reliably quantifies intra-culm leaf area inequality. By bridging theoretical distribution models with field-derived inequality metrics, our approach provides insights into canopy efficiency, photosynthetic optimization, and hydraulic trade-offs. Future work should test this approach in other grass species and assess its generalizability in plants with contrasting canopy architectures.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Nanjing Forestry University (CN), Aarhus University (DK), Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.