“Steps” towards a corpus of SCOTUS opinions annotated using a Swalesian approach

In the tradition of Moreno and Swales (2018), this paper presents the creation of a manually annotated resource for supporting teaching English for Legal Purposes (ELP) and for Natural Language Processing (NLP) purposes. After justifying the use of Supreme Court of the United States opinions, we define our coding scheme by adapting the move model of rhetorical structure in specialized discourse. We describe the methodology and the implementation of the annotation campaign. We analyze how our methodology and the resulting annotation scheme diverge from those described in the literature as well as the advantages that these divergences afford. In addition to the research article, we release several supplementary materials which aim to make the process transparent and serve other researchers aiming to annotate specialized discourse with the help of machine learning techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibérica
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2785.50.45
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Steps” towards a corpus of SCOTUS opinions annotated using a Swalesian approach

Christine Jacquin, Mary Catherine Lavissière, Nicolás Hernández, Anas Belfathi et al.
Ibérica
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

“Steps” towards a corpus of SCOTUS opinions annotated using a Swalesian approach

Christine Jacquin, Mary Catherine Lavissière, Nicolás Hernández, Anas Belfathi, Laura Monceaux-Cachard, Warren Bonnard
article en

Abstract

In the tradition of Moreno and Swales (2018), this paper presents the creation of a manually annotated resource for supporting teaching English for Legal Purposes (ELP) and for Natural Language Processing (NLP) purposes. After justifying the use of Supreme Court of the United States opinions, we define our coding scheme by adapting the move model of rhetorical structure in specialized discourse. We describe the methodology and the implementation of the annotation campaign. We analyze how our methodology and the resulting annotation scheme diverge from those described in the literature as well as the advantages that these divergences afford. In addition to the research article, we release several supplementary materials which aim to make the process transparent and serve other researchers aiming to annotate specialized discourse with the help of machine learning techniques.

Ibérica(50)
Université de Lorraine (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Steps” towards a corpus of SCOTUS opinions annotated using a Swalesian approach — Christine Jacquin, Mary Catherine Lavissière, et al. · Ibérica (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS