Participation in just transition – gaps in applying deliberative governance in coal regions of Greater Poland, Lodzkie, Lower Silesia and Silesia

The paper explores the use of proactive participation tools in strengthening a deliberative governance (DG) within transition planning for coal regions. The main research question is: to what extent was the planning of the just transition in Polish Coal Regions (PCRs) based on the proactive participation postulated in the DG approach? Proactive participation, as applied in the case of PCRs supported by the Just Transition Fund (JTF) – including Eastern Greater Poland, the Walbrzych Subregion, the Belchatów Area of Transition (BAT), and the Silesian coal regions – have encountered a number of barriers during the programming of the Territorial Just Transition Plans (TJTPs). Therefore, the aim of the paper is to indicate the gaps in participatory practices during the programming of TJTPs for PCR that limit the DG. The study employs a focused comparison framework (FCF), combining a conceptual analysis of DG in context of detailed review of participatory instruments used in TJTPs across the PCRs. The methodology draws on the Horizon DUST project framework including in-depth interviews with policymakers and decision-makers in the four PCRs. The main findings highlight a detailed typology of gaps to proactive participation identified in the surveyed regions, including a limited range of participatory instruments, poor use of digital tools, lack of direct citizen involvement, insufficient consideration of local and sub-local levels, and the unsatisfactory commitment of public authorities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2025.77.02
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participation in just transition – gaps in applying deliberative governance in coal regions of Greater Poland, Lodzkie, Lower Silesia and Silesia

Adam Drobniak, Małgorzata Rogowska
Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Participation in just transition – gaps in applying deliberative governance in coal regions of Greater Poland, Lodzkie, Lower Silesia and Silesia

Adam Drobniak, Małgorzata Rogowska
article en

Abstract

The paper explores the use of proactive participation tools in strengthening a deliberative governance (DG) within transition planning for coal regions. The main research question is: to what extent was the planning of the just transition in Polish Coal Regions (PCRs) based on the proactive participation postulated in the DG approach? Proactive participation, as applied in the case of PCRs supported by the Just Transition Fund (JTF) – including Eastern Greater Poland, the Walbrzych Subregion, the Belchatów Area of Transition (BAT), and the Silesian coal regions – have encountered a number of barriers during the programming of the Territorial Just Transition Plans (TJTPs). Therefore, the aim of the paper is to indicate the gaps in participatory practices during the programming of TJTPs for PCR that limit the DG. The study employs a focused comparison framework (FCF), combining a conceptual analysis of DG in context of detailed review of participatory instruments used in TJTPs across the PCRs. The methodology draws on the Horizon DUST project framework including in-depth interviews with policymakers and decision-makers in the four PCRs. The main findings highlight a detailed typology of gaps to proactive participation identified in the surveyed regions, including a limited range of participatory instruments, poor use of digital tools, lack of direct citizen involvement, insufficient consideration of local and sub-local levels, and the unsatisfactory commitment of public authorities.

Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna(77)
University of Economics in Katowice (PL), Wroclaw University of Economics and Business (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.