Challenges in global climate models to represent cloud response to aerosols: insights from volcanic eruptions

Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI) remain a major source of climate uncertainty due to missing large-scale observational constraints. Such a constraint, with global cloud representativeness, has recently been developed based on the Holuhraun-2014 volcanic eruption from machine learning with satellite observations. Here, we confront this large-scale observational constraint against six diverse global climate models to advance our understanding of ACI simulation uncertainty. We show that marine liquid cloud optical depth responses to aerosols are reasonably well simulated, although through compensating errors. However, all models largely underestimate cloud cover responses to aerosols, with five of them outside the 90% confidence level. This persistent bias remains despite tuning five distinct cloud schemes and testing various key cloud processes. Such bias in cloud cover response is a major driver of simulation uncertainty in ACI cooling and needs to be addressed urgently to improve climate projections and estimations of climate sensitivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-67359-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in global climate models to represent cloud response to aerosols: insights from volcanic eruptions

Pierre Nabat, Martine Michou, Florent Malavelle, David Neubauer et al.
1 citations
Nature Communications
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
1.11
article

Challenges in global climate models to represent cloud response to aerosols: insights from volcanic eruptions

Pierre Nabat, Martine Michou, Florent Malavelle, David Neubauer, Anton Laakso, Tianle Yuan, Gunnar Myhre, Ulrike Lohmann, Minghuai Wang, George Jordan, Yu Wang, Hao Wang, Daniel G. Partridge, Ying Chen, Paul R. Field
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aerosol-cloud interactions (ACI) remain a major source of climate uncertainty due to missing large-scale observational constraints. Such a constraint, with global cloud representativeness, has recently been developed based on the Holuhraun-2014 volcanic eruption from machine learning with satellite observations. Here, we confront this large-scale observational constraint against six diverse global climate models to advance our understanding of ACI simulation uncertainty. We show that marine liquid cloud optical depth responses to aerosols are reasonably well simulated, although through compensating errors. However, all models largely underestimate cloud cover responses to aerosols, with five of them outside the 90% confidence level. This persistent bias remains despite tuning five distinct cloud schemes and testing various key cloud processes. Such bias in cloud cover response is a major driver of simulation uncertainty in ACI cooling and needs to be addressed urgently to improve climate projections and estimations of climate sensitivity.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Met Office (GB), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of Leeds (GB), University of Exeter (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), Météo-France (FR), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), University of Birmingham (GB), Nanjing University (CN), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, University of Exeter, University of Oxford, European Commission, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universitetet i Oslo, ETH Zürich Foundation, Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico, National Supercomputing Centre Singapore, Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Natural Environment Research Council, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, Leibniz-Institut für Troposphärenforschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.