The sticky, muddled geopolitics of sustainable finance regulation

Abstract The geopolitical implications of climate change are vast, including the harnessing of capital to finance investment in response to it. Sustainable finance is an emerging geopolitical terrain that offers countries the ability to project and protect their policy preferences through their control over financial flows, institutions, and assets. This article explores the ways in which the regulation of sustainable finance—under the broad category of ESG (environmental, social, governance) investing and otherwise—enables and constrains its use as a means to re-orient financial flows to achieve geopolitical objectives. While the use of sustainable finance as a tool of geopolitical competition is still nascent, I argue that geopolitics diminishes the capacity of the financial system to effectively and equitably address climate change and other sustainability threats and hinders international lawmaking and global regulatory coordination in sustainable finance. This article analyses the use of sustainable finance regulation as a geopolitical strategy and explores how the international financial architecture may be able to overcome geopolitical pressures to facilitate global cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Economic Law
Published
2025-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaf045
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The sticky, muddled geopolitics of sustainable finance regulation

Stephen Kim Park
Journal of International Economic Law
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

The sticky, muddled geopolitics of sustainable finance regulation

Stephen Kim Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract The geopolitical implications of climate change are vast, including the harnessing of capital to finance investment in response to it. Sustainable finance is an emerging geopolitical terrain that offers countries the ability to project and protect their policy preferences through their control over financial flows, institutions, and assets. This article explores the ways in which the regulation of sustainable finance—under the broad category of ESG (environmental, social, governance) investing and otherwise—enables and constrains its use as a means to re-orient financial flows to achieve geopolitical objectives. While the use of sustainable finance as a tool of geopolitical competition is still nascent, I argue that geopolitics diminishes the capacity of the financial system to effectively and equitably address climate change and other sustainability threats and hinders international lawmaking and global regulatory coordination in sustainable finance. This article analyses the use of sustainable finance regulation as a geopolitical strategy and explores how the international financial architecture may be able to overcome geopolitical pressures to facilitate global cooperation.

Journal of International Economic LawVol. 28(4)
St. Stephen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The sticky, muddled geopolitics of sustainable finance regulation — Stephen Kim Park · Journal of International Economic Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS