Water Conservation in Orthopaedic Surgical Scrubbing: A Comparative Analysis of Water Consumption in Standard and Modified Surgical Scrubbing Techniques

Background Surgical hand scrubbing plays a vital role in preventing surgical site infections. The current guidelines recommend a scrub that lasts between two and five minutes. This, however, poses a challenge where the traditional continuous flow scrub method consumes around 20 litres of water. With water scarcity quickly becoming a global issue, this highlights the importance of finding more efficient scrubbing techniques. Objective A comparison of the duration of scrubbing and water consumed between the standard continuous flow technique and a modified tap on/off technique, to determine if significant water savings can be achieved without compromising scrub quality. Methods This study was carried out in the trauma and orthopaedic department at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Thirty-four healthcare professionals participated by performing both standard and modified scrub techniques. To measure the amount of water, a 25-litre container along with a weighing method was used. Stopwatches were used to track the scrub duration and the time the tap was actively running. Results The modified scrubbing technique led to reduced water use, as average staff members used 5.6 ± 1.78 litres (mean ± SD). In the standard technique, the median water use was 16.2 L (interquartile range (IQR) 6.15). The mean saving of 11.34 ± 5.57 litres (mean ± SD) was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Scrub times were slightly longer with the modified technique, showing a mean increase of 14.96 ± 44.30 seconds (mean ± SD), but this did not reach a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The modified scrubbing method delivers significant water savings without compromising the duration of the process. This makes it a practical and sustainable option, while also supporting the NHS's commitment to the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.99519
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Conservation in Orthopaedic Surgical Scrubbing: A Comparative Analysis of Water Consumption in Standard and Modified Surgical Scrubbing Techniques

Aaisha Shahbaz, Deepa Bose, Dinesh Yasothkumar, Sohail Muzammil et al.
Cureus
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Water Conservation in Orthopaedic Surgical Scrubbing: A Comparative Analysis of Water Consumption in Standard and Modified Surgical Scrubbing Techniques

Aaisha Shahbaz, Deepa Bose, Dinesh Yasothkumar, Sohail Muzammil, Rohma Shahbaz, Fahad Imami, Kamen S Dosanjh, Mohamed Messwi
article en

Abstract

Background Surgical hand scrubbing plays a vital role in preventing surgical site infections. The current guidelines recommend a scrub that lasts between two and five minutes. This, however, poses a challenge where the traditional continuous flow scrub method consumes around 20 litres of water. With water scarcity quickly becoming a global issue, this highlights the importance of finding more efficient scrubbing techniques. Objective A comparison of the duration of scrubbing and water consumed between the standard continuous flow technique and a modified tap on/off technique, to determine if significant water savings can be achieved without compromising scrub quality. Methods This study was carried out in the trauma and orthopaedic department at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Thirty-four healthcare professionals participated by performing both standard and modified scrub techniques. To measure the amount of water, a 25-litre container along with a weighing method was used. Stopwatches were used to track the scrub duration and the time the tap was actively running. Results The modified scrubbing technique led to reduced water use, as average staff members used 5.6 ± 1.78 litres (mean ± SD). In the standard technique, the median water use was 16.2 L (interquartile range (IQR) 6.15). The mean saving of 11.34 ± 5.57 litres (mean ± SD) was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Scrub times were slightly longer with the modified technique, showing a mean increase of 14.96 ± 44.30 seconds (mean ± SD), but this did not reach a statistically significant difference. Conclusion The modified scrubbing method delivers significant water savings without compromising the duration of the process. This makes it a practical and sustainable option, while also supporting the NHS's commitment to the environment.

CureusVol. 17(12)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Combined Military Hospital (PK), University College Birmingham (GB), Doctors Hospital (US), Air University (PK)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.