Are All Degrees Worth the Same? A Comparative Analysis of Community College and University Baccalaureate Graduates’ Financial Outcomes

Objective: This study examines the financial outcomes of graduates from community college baccalaureate (CCB) programs compared to those from traditional 4-year university baccalaureate programs in Ontario, Canada. It aims to understand whether graduating from a CCB program influences earnings, student loan status, and loan balances relative to university graduates. Additionally, it explores how field of study and post-graduation pathways shape these outcomes. Methods: Using administrative data from Statistics Canada, this study analyzes four cohorts of Ontario college and university graduates from 2010 to 2013. It employs ordinary least squares regression models to estimate the relationship between CCB graduation and financial outcomes, controlling for individual and institutional characteristics. Results: CCB graduates experience a wage premium of 5% to 14% 2 years post-graduation compared to their university counterparts, conditional on postgraduate pathway. They are also 13 to 14 percentage points less likely to incur student loan debt, though no significant differences are observed in loan balances among those who borrow. The wage advantages are particularly notable in applied and technical fields. Conclusion: The findings suggest that CCB degrees provide competitive financial returns, challenging traditional assumptions about institutional quality. This study contributes to the literature on horizontal stratification in higher education and highlights the need for further research on mechanisms driving these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Community College Review
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521251398470
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are All Degrees Worth the Same? A Comparative Analysis of Community College and University Baccalaureate Graduates’ Financial Outcomes

Daniel Corral
Community College Review
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Are All Degrees Worth the Same? A Comparative Analysis of Community College and University Baccalaureate Graduates’ Financial Outcomes

Daniel Corral
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the financial outcomes of graduates from community college baccalaureate (CCB) programs compared to those from traditional 4-year university baccalaureate programs in Ontario, Canada. It aims to understand whether graduating from a CCB program influences earnings, student loan status, and loan balances relative to university graduates. Additionally, it explores how field of study and post-graduation pathways shape these outcomes. Methods: Using administrative data from Statistics Canada, this study analyzes four cohorts of Ontario college and university graduates from 2010 to 2013. It employs ordinary least squares regression models to estimate the relationship between CCB graduation and financial outcomes, controlling for individual and institutional characteristics. Results: CCB graduates experience a wage premium of 5% to 14% 2 years post-graduation compared to their university counterparts, conditional on postgraduate pathway. They are also 13 to 14 percentage points less likely to incur student loan debt, though no significant differences are observed in loan balances among those who borrow. The wage advantages are particularly notable in applied and technical fields. Conclusion: The findings suggest that CCB degrees provide competitive financial returns, challenging traditional assumptions about institutional quality. This study contributes to the literature on horizontal stratification in higher education and highlights the need for further research on mechanisms driving these results.

Community College ReviewVol. 54(2)
University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.