Two Decades of Human–Elephant Conflict in Jharkhand: Spatial and Ecological Drivers of Human Fatalities

Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC) is a major issue in South Asia, especially in India, where rapid development and increased human-elephant overlap intensify the problem. We analyzed human fatality and injury patterns over 23 years (2000-2023) in Jharkhand, identified influencing factors, and prioritized villages for targeted mitigation. We collected data from 22 Forest Divisions, comprising 1740 incidents, including 1340 fatalities and 400 injuries, predominantly in Ranchi, Khunti, and East Singhbhum. The rise in conflict incidents during the monsoon season could be associated with poor visibility. Spatial analysis revealed that conflict hotspots are concentrated near protected areas and fragmented forest habitats. High-conflict villages exhibit greater cropland and built-up areas, while medium- and low-conflict villages show variability in land use patterns. Landscape fragmentation metrics, such as forest patch density, are significantly associated with conflict intensity, emphasizing the role of habitat degradation and fragmentation. Proximity to forests, water sources, roads, and elephant reserves strongly influences conflict risks. While urbanization disrupts elephant corridors, forest-edge areas near agricultural zones are critical conflict zones. Therefore, mitigation strategies must prioritize high-conflict villages, including villages Ramua, Chatambari, Gerapokhar, Gagi, Bhatin, and Koderma, through targeted interventions. Our study highlights the necessity of integrating ecological and socio-economic dimensions into conflict mitigation, emphasizing habitat restoration, land use, and targeted infrastructure planning, and community engagement. By implementing such measures, it is possible to reduce the underlying drivers of HEC, thereby safeguarding human lives while ensuring elephant conservation and contributing to broader biodiversity and ecosystem health goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72679
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Decades of Human–Elephant Conflict in Jharkhand: Spatial and Ecological Drivers of Human Fatalities

Kamalika Roy, Parag Nigam, Anukul Nath, Bilal Habib et al.
Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Two Decades of Human–Elephant Conflict in Jharkhand: Spatial and Ecological Drivers of Human Fatalities

Kamalika Roy, Parag Nigam, Anukul Nath, Bilal Habib, Dheeraj Mittal, Ramesh Kumar Pandey
article en

Abstract

Human-Elephant Conflict (HEC) is a major issue in South Asia, especially in India, where rapid development and increased human-elephant overlap intensify the problem. We analyzed human fatality and injury patterns over 23 years (2000-2023) in Jharkhand, identified influencing factors, and prioritized villages for targeted mitigation. We collected data from 22 Forest Divisions, comprising 1740 incidents, including 1340 fatalities and 400 injuries, predominantly in Ranchi, Khunti, and East Singhbhum. The rise in conflict incidents during the monsoon season could be associated with poor visibility. Spatial analysis revealed that conflict hotspots are concentrated near protected areas and fragmented forest habitats. High-conflict villages exhibit greater cropland and built-up areas, while medium- and low-conflict villages show variability in land use patterns. Landscape fragmentation metrics, such as forest patch density, are significantly associated with conflict intensity, emphasizing the role of habitat degradation and fragmentation. Proximity to forests, water sources, roads, and elephant reserves strongly influences conflict risks. While urbanization disrupts elephant corridors, forest-edge areas near agricultural zones are critical conflict zones. Therefore, mitigation strategies must prioritize high-conflict villages, including villages Ramua, Chatambari, Gerapokhar, Gagi, Bhatin, and Koderma, through targeted interventions. Our study highlights the necessity of integrating ecological and socio-economic dimensions into conflict mitigation, emphasizing habitat restoration, land use, and targeted infrastructure planning, and community engagement. By implementing such measures, it is possible to reduce the underlying drivers of HEC, thereby safeguarding human lives while ensuring elephant conservation and contributing to broader biodiversity and ecosystem health goals.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(12)
Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (IN), Wildlife Institute of India (IN), Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.