Navigating the Frontier of artificial intelligence implementation in radiology – part 1: Performance assessment

Despite the exponential growth in academic publications and industrial investments in artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging, clinical translation remains disproportionately low. Notably, the absence of internationally recognized guidelines for evaluating AI model performance and ethical considerations creates a critical gap in current practices. In this regard, we aim to offer a practical concise perspective exploring performance challenges to implementation while focusing on their mitigation. The dialog continues in subsequent work (part 2) which focuses on ethical issues. In this part, we explore the challenges inherent to the performance evaluation of AI in radiology, focusing on data heterogeneity, the choice of performance metrics and their interpretability, and data access. By shedding light on these issues and discussing potential opportunities, this work contributes to the ongoing dialog surrounding the practical integration of AI in clinical settings. It highlights the imperative need for established guidelines to ensure the safe and efficient deployment of AI technologies in medical imaging, ultimately bridging the gap between theoretical potential and practical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Neuroradiology Journal
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009251407175
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Frontier of artificial intelligence implementation in radiology – part 1: Performance assessment

Burak Berksu Ozkara, Melissa Chen, B. Bersu Ozcan, Max Wintermark et al.
The Neuroradiology Journal
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Navigating the Frontier of artificial intelligence implementation in radiology – part 1: Performance assessment

Burak Berksu Ozkara, Melissa Chen, B. Bersu Ozcan, Max Wintermark, Samir A. Dagher, Mert Karabacak, Vivek Srikar Yedavalli, Maguy Farhat
article en

Abstract

Despite the exponential growth in academic publications and industrial investments in artificial intelligence (AI) in medical imaging, clinical translation remains disproportionately low. Notably, the absence of internationally recognized guidelines for evaluating AI model performance and ethical considerations creates a critical gap in current practices. In this regard, we aim to offer a practical concise perspective exploring performance challenges to implementation while focusing on their mitigation. The dialog continues in subsequent work (part 2) which focuses on ethical issues. In this part, we explore the challenges inherent to the performance evaluation of AI in radiology, focusing on data heterogeneity, the choice of performance metrics and their interpretability, and data access. By shedding light on these issues and discussing potential opportunities, this work contributes to the ongoing dialog surrounding the practical integration of AI in clinical settings. It highlights the imperative need for established guidelines to ensure the safe and efficient deployment of AI technologies in medical imaging, ultimately bridging the gap between theoretical potential and practical implementation.

The Neuroradiology Journal
Mount Sinai Health System (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Maryland Medical System (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Southwestern University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.