Linear transfer–driven adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition for full-waveform LiDAR

Full-waveform LiDAR is extensively used in topographic surveying, forestry surveys, and urban monitoring, where accurate waveform decomposition is critical for high-quality point cloud generation and feature extraction. However, existing decomposition methods face two fundamental challenges: symmetric models cannot capture the asymmetric tailing characteristics of echoes, and asymmetric models with fixed shape parameters fail to adapt to diverse scattering conditions. These limitations lead to under-decomposition and over-decomposition issues that compromise decomposition accuracy in complex overlapping scenarios. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition (AAGD) method. First, a stable linear relationship between the broadening factor and standard deviation ratio is established through systematic convolution experiments. Based on this, an adaptive parameter adjustment mechanism is constructed to map the measured pulse characteristics to echo shape parameters for the establishment of a complete adaptive asymmetric Gaussian model. In combination with Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) optimization, AAGD dynamically adjusts decomposition parameters according to the scattering characteristics of individual echo components to ensure both mathematical precision and physical consistency of the decomposition results. Experiments on simulated and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data show that AAGD achieves 96.08% detection accuracy in simulated data, improving over-decomposition (0.40%) and under-decomposition (3.52%). In GEDI data, AAGD reduces root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 18.08%-41.34% compared to Gaussian decomposition (GD) and asymmetric generalized Gaussian decomposition (ASGGD), demonstrating superior performance under diverse scattering conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Optics Express
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.581680
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear transfer–driven adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition for full-waveform LiDAR

Guoqing Zhou, Xiang Zhou, X. Sunney Xie
Optics Express
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Linear transfer–driven adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition for full-waveform LiDAR

Guoqing Zhou, Xiang Zhou, X. Sunney Xie
article en

Abstract

Full-waveform LiDAR is extensively used in topographic surveying, forestry surveys, and urban monitoring, where accurate waveform decomposition is critical for high-quality point cloud generation and feature extraction. However, existing decomposition methods face two fundamental challenges: symmetric models cannot capture the asymmetric tailing characteristics of echoes, and asymmetric models with fixed shape parameters fail to adapt to diverse scattering conditions. These limitations lead to under-decomposition and over-decomposition issues that compromise decomposition accuracy in complex overlapping scenarios. To address these challenges, this paper proposes an adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition (AAGD) method. First, a stable linear relationship between the broadening factor and standard deviation ratio is established through systematic convolution experiments. Based on this, an adaptive parameter adjustment mechanism is constructed to map the measured pulse characteristics to echo shape parameters for the establishment of a complete adaptive asymmetric Gaussian model. In combination with Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) optimization, AAGD dynamically adjusts decomposition parameters according to the scattering characteristics of individual echo components to ensure both mathematical precision and physical consistency of the decomposition results. Experiments on simulated and Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data show that AAGD achieves 96.08% detection accuracy in simulated data, improving over-decomposition (0.40%) and under-decomposition (3.52%). In GEDI data, AAGD reduces root-mean-square error (RMSE) by 18.08%-41.34% compared to Gaussian decomposition (GD) and asymmetric generalized Gaussian decomposition (ASGGD), demonstrating superior performance under diverse scattering conditions.

Optics ExpressVol. 34(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Linear transfer–driven adaptive asymmetric Gaussian decomposition for full-waveform LiDAR — Guoqing Zhou, Xiang Zhou, et al. · Optics Express (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS