Confocal Raman Imaging of Secondary Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions From the UHP Calc‐Silicate Rocks (Kokchetav Massif): Hydrous Carbonatitic Melt/Fluid Origin and Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions Evolution

ABSTRACT Findings of primary carbonate‐bearing inclusions in garnet porphyroblasts from the calc‐silicate rock of the Kokchetav massif indicate the presence of hydrous carbonatitic melt at the UHP peak metamorphism. However, two contrasting hypotheses exist for the formation of these inclusions: (1) Inclusions were trapped by garnet in the form of primary carbonatitic melt at peak metamorphism, and (2) inclusions were trapped as mineral aggregate during the prograde metamorphic stage and underwent melting close to the UHP peak metamorphism. A thorough Raman study revealed that UHP secondary carbonate‐bearing inclusions, located in healed cracks, contain calcite, dolomite, quartz, phengite/muscovite, graphite, and CH4, whereas primary carbonate‐bearing inclusions exhibit a distinct mineral association comprising phlogopite, calcite, dolomite, graphite/diamond, allanite, and chlorite. Most likely, primary inclusions initially were trapped as hydrous carbonatitic melt/fluid + mineral aggregate ± silicate melt in the garnet/clinopyroxene. Melting of this mineral aggregate in primary inclusions or decompression at the UHP conditions ( P > 3.5 GPa) resulted in brittle failure of the host mineral and formation of secondary inclusions chains. Both types of inclusions contain daughter minerals and step‐daughter silicates formed by the reaction of the carbonatitic melt/fluid and host garnet. In contrast to the primary inclusions, the secondary inclusions almost do not contain accidentally trapped and retrograde minerals and, thus, are the most suitable for the UHP carbonatitic melt/fluid reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.70093
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confocal Raman Imaging of Secondary Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions From the UHP Calc‐Silicate Rocks (Kokchetav Massif): Hydrous Carbonatitic Melt/Fluid Origin and Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions Evolution

Anton Shatskiy, Andrey V. Korsakov, Yulia G. Vinogradova, Anastasia O. Mikhno et al.
Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
article

Confocal Raman Imaging of Secondary Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions From the UHP Calc‐Silicate Rocks (Kokchetav Massif): Hydrous Carbonatitic Melt/Fluid Origin and Carbonate‐Bearing Inclusions Evolution

Anton Shatskiy, Andrey V. Korsakov, Yulia G. Vinogradova, Anastasia O. Mikhno, Igor S. Sharygin, Sergey V. Rashchenko
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Findings of primary carbonate‐bearing inclusions in garnet porphyroblasts from the calc‐silicate rock of the Kokchetav massif indicate the presence of hydrous carbonatitic melt at the UHP peak metamorphism. However, two contrasting hypotheses exist for the formation of these inclusions: (1) Inclusions were trapped by garnet in the form of primary carbonatitic melt at peak metamorphism, and (2) inclusions were trapped as mineral aggregate during the prograde metamorphic stage and underwent melting close to the UHP peak metamorphism. A thorough Raman study revealed that UHP secondary carbonate‐bearing inclusions, located in healed cracks, contain calcite, dolomite, quartz, phengite/muscovite, graphite, and CH4, whereas primary carbonate‐bearing inclusions exhibit a distinct mineral association comprising phlogopite, calcite, dolomite, graphite/diamond, allanite, and chlorite. Most likely, primary inclusions initially were trapped as hydrous carbonatitic melt/fluid + mineral aggregate ± silicate melt in the garnet/clinopyroxene. Melting of this mineral aggregate in primary inclusions or decompression at the UHP conditions ( P > 3.5 GPa) resulted in brittle failure of the host mineral and formation of secondary inclusions chains. Both types of inclusions contain daughter minerals and step‐daughter silicates formed by the reaction of the carbonatitic melt/fluid and host garnet. In contrast to the primary inclusions, the secondary inclusions almost do not contain accidentally trapped and retrograde minerals and, thus, are the most suitable for the UHP carbonatitic melt/fluid reconstruction.

Journal of Raman Spectroscopy
Institute of the Earth’s Crust (RU), V.S. Sobolev Institute of Geology and Mineralogy (RU), V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.