Comparative Nutritional Analysis and Nutri-Score Evaluation of Diverse Pizza Crust Types

This study evaluated the nutritional composition and Nutri-Score classification of 60 restaurant-prepared pizzas (15 recipes × 4 crust types: classic, pan, italian, cheesy), aiming to identify how crust formulation influences overall nutritional quality. All samples were analyzed per 100 g using standardized laboratory methods in an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited facility. Significant nutritional differences were observed across crust types. Classic crusts showed the most favorable profile, with consistently lower energy, total fats, saturated fats, carbohydrates, sugars, and salt. In contrast, italian and cheesy crusts exhibited higher caloric density and increased levels of saturated fats and sodium. Pan crusts displayed the highest dietary fiber content and an overall intermediate nutritional profile. When applying the Nutri-Score algorithm, pan achieved the most favorable mean FSAm-NPS score, followed by classic, cheesy, and italian. Most products were classified as C or D, with no samples falling into category E. Nutri-Score revealed nutritional disparities not fully captured by classical nutrient analysis, demonstrating its usefulness as a simplified, consumer-oriented interpretive tool. These findings highlight the substantial impact of crust formulation on nutritional quality and support the potential implementation of interpretive labeling systems, such as Nutri-Score, in the HoReCa sector to enhance nutrition literacy and promote healthier food choices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Food Science and Technology
Published
2025-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:2025.0068
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Nutritional Analysis and Nutri-Score Evaluation of Diverse Pizza Crust Types

Rodica Sobolu, Oana Reget, Daniel Ionut Berean, Sorin Daniel Dan et al.
Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Food Science and Technology
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Comparative Nutritional Analysis and Nutri-Score Evaluation of Diverse Pizza Crust Types

Rodica Sobolu, Oana Reget, Daniel Ionut Berean, Sorin Daniel Dan, Luciana Cătălina Panait, Raluca Cimpean, Alexandra Tăbăran, Sergiu Condor
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the nutritional composition and Nutri-Score classification of 60 restaurant-prepared pizzas (15 recipes × 4 crust types: classic, pan, italian, cheesy), aiming to identify how crust formulation influences overall nutritional quality. All samples were analyzed per 100 g using standardized laboratory methods in an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited facility. Significant nutritional differences were observed across crust types. Classic crusts showed the most favorable profile, with consistently lower energy, total fats, saturated fats, carbohydrates, sugars, and salt. In contrast, italian and cheesy crusts exhibited higher caloric density and increased levels of saturated fats and sodium. Pan crusts displayed the highest dietary fiber content and an overall intermediate nutritional profile. When applying the Nutri-Score algorithm, pan achieved the most favorable mean FSAm-NPS score, followed by classic, cheesy, and italian. Most products were classified as C or D, with no samples falling into category E. Nutri-Score revealed nutritional disparities not fully captured by classical nutrient analysis, demonstrating its usefulness as a simplified, consumer-oriented interpretive tool. These findings highlight the substantial impact of crust formulation on nutritional quality and support the potential implementation of interpretive labeling systems, such as Nutri-Score, in the HoReCa sector to enhance nutrition literacy and promote healthier food choices.

Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Food Science and TechnologyVol. 83(1)
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.