Digital Gait Measures Discriminate People with Friedreich's Ataxia from Healthy Controls

Digital gait measures from wearable sensors were discriminative, reliable, and showed concurrent validity for evaluating ataxia severity during an instrumented walk test. These results suggest promising utility of digital gait outcomes for use in FRDA clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70465
Primary Topic
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Gait Measures Discriminate People with Friedreich's Ataxia from Healthy Controls

Patricia Carlson‐Kuhta, Vrutangkumar V. Shah, Kristen Sowalsky, Christian Rummey et al.
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
article

Digital Gait Measures Discriminate People with Friedreich's Ataxia from Healthy Controls

Patricia Carlson‐Kuhta, Vrutangkumar V. Shah, Kristen Sowalsky, Christian Rummey, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Fay Bahling Horak, James McNames, Liana S. Rosenthal, Delaram Safarpour, Mahmoud El‐Gohary, Daniel Muzyka, Hannah Casey, Susan Perlman, Christopher M. Gomez
article en

Abstract

Digital gait measures from wearable sensors were discriminative, reliable, and showed concurrent validity for evaluating ataxia severity during an instrumented walk test. These results suggest promising utility of digital gait outcomes for use in FRDA clinical trials.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Clarion University (US), Portland State University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Chicago (US), Center for Neuro-Oncology (US), Swiss Data Science Center (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.